Active Users:786 Time:02/11/2025 09:56:24 PM
I thought the same. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 17/12/2010 03:28:29 PM
I was under the impression that it was destination based, so while you couldn't make a gateway from inside the effect to outside, or vise versa, it wouldn't affect gateways to two points within the dome. That would match up with its dream equivalent; Perrin could not jump into or out of, but could jump within the boundary of the dome.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 03:30:25 AM 2157 Views
Well, later Androl couldn't make one either later on - 17/12/2010 03:40:43 AM 1172 Views
Agreed. That was my thought when I was reading too. *NM* - 17/12/2010 03:52:28 AM 475 Views
yah, I think it could just be a matter of timing. *NM* - 17/12/2010 04:29:26 AM 408 Views
No error. - 17/12/2010 04:38:22 AM 1184 Views
Combined with the weather conditions and Logain reference - 17/12/2010 04:50:12 AM 1058 Views
Re: Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 05:01:46 AM 990 Views
Work? It seemed obvious the dreamspike wasn't in place yet when Androl made the mini-gw *NM* - 17/12/2010 05:05:20 AM 453 Views
It's just weird chronology and chapter placement. - 17/12/2010 09:21:01 PM 878 Views
Exactly... - 18/12/2010 12:23:31 AM 1205 Views
Re: Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 03:00:23 PM 921 Views
Correct--no error. You can only make gateways to other locations within the dreamspike radius. - 17/12/2010 03:14:09 PM 831 Views
Incorrect... the effect is different in TAR and in the real world - 17/12/2010 11:23:26 PM 1089 Views
One Correction - 20/12/2010 06:38:57 PM 870 Views
Re: One Correction - 21/12/2010 01:42:28 AM 777 Views
I thought the same. *NM* - 17/12/2010 03:28:29 PM 382 Views
I think it blocks all gateways. - 17/12/2010 04:08:59 PM 979 Views
I remember that, too. - 17/12/2010 07:19:56 PM 867 Views
Your logic is undeniable. *NM* - 17/12/2010 09:26:30 PM 428 Views

Reply to Message