Active Users:225 Time:06/05/2024 08:56:22 PM
I thought the same. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 17/12/2010 03:28:29 PM
I was under the impression that it was destination based, so while you couldn't make a gateway from inside the effect to outside, or vise versa, it wouldn't affect gateways to two points within the dome. That would match up with its dream equivalent; Perrin could not jump into or out of, but could jump within the boundary of the dome.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 03:30:25 AM 1916 Views
Well, later Androl couldn't make one either later on - 17/12/2010 03:40:43 AM 950 Views
Agreed. That was my thought when I was reading too. *NM* - 17/12/2010 03:52:28 AM 375 Views
yah, I think it could just be a matter of timing. *NM* - 17/12/2010 04:29:26 AM 317 Views
No error. - 17/12/2010 04:38:22 AM 970 Views
Combined with the weather conditions and Logain reference - 17/12/2010 04:50:12 AM 847 Views
Re: Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 05:01:46 AM 771 Views
Work? It seemed obvious the dreamspike wasn't in place yet when Androl made the mini-gw *NM* - 17/12/2010 05:05:20 AM 352 Views
It's just weird chronology and chapter placement. - 17/12/2010 09:21:01 PM 653 Views
Exactly... - 18/12/2010 12:23:31 AM 880 Views
Re: Error by Sanderson, or plot thickener? - 17/12/2010 03:00:23 PM 703 Views
Correct--no error. You can only make gateways to other locations within the dreamspike radius. - 17/12/2010 03:14:09 PM 611 Views
Incorrect... the effect is different in TAR and in the real world - 17/12/2010 11:23:26 PM 769 Views
One Correction - 20/12/2010 06:38:57 PM 641 Views
Re: One Correction - 21/12/2010 01:42:28 AM 543 Views
I thought the same. *NM* - 17/12/2010 03:28:29 PM 287 Views
I think it blocks all gateways. - 17/12/2010 04:08:59 PM 725 Views
I remember that, too. - 17/12/2010 07:19:56 PM 627 Views
Your logic is undeniable. *NM* - 17/12/2010 09:26:30 PM 335 Views

Reply to Message