Active Users:338 Time:17/06/2025 04:49:58 PM
Re: Nope. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).


He WAS there. So the viewing came true.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1903 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 480 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1000 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 846 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 666 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 721 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 665 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 910 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 815 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1035 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 358 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 912 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 736 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 740 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 716 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 749 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 822 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 701 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 763 Views

Reply to Message