Active Users:358 Time:16/05/2024 10:59:30 PM
Re: But if Ishamael was completely free at that stage, why didn't he just take the boys himself? Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 13/03/2011 06:41:42 PM
I feel there are a number of irregularities in TEotW, in terms of Ishamael's actions. He restricts his appearances completely to tel'aran'rhiod, except from the instance where he appears as a projection (described as a "flickering candle", if I recall correcly) outside Shadar Logoth.

Now, we know that he was fully free approximately twenty years earlier, when he killed the head of the Black Ajah, but has he really been free all the time since then? If he was completely free at the time of TEotW, it is certainly strange that he does not get involved personally in the hunt of the three boys, instead relying on Shadowspawn and Fain. If he was free, why did he not appear in person to drive the Shadowspawn into SL? Why appear as a projection only? Why restrict his appearance to T'a'r when he could have swooped in and taken the boys himself? It seems to me that this behaviour would make more sense if he was still bound in some way.

Do you have any thoughts on this?
Reply to message
Many 'hounds' or just Padan Fain? - 13/03/2011 04:43:17 AM 1319 Views
Fain was 1 of a few and he'd found the boys the year before... - 13/03/2011 05:00:47 AM 748 Views
Re: Fain was 1 of a few and he'd found the boys the year before... - 13/03/2011 05:09:55 AM 809 Views
they had a general idea of what they were looking for - 13/03/2011 02:23:53 PM 788 Views
Re: they had a general idea of what they were looking for - 13/03/2011 02:39:31 PM 553 Views
Re: they had a general idea of what they were looking for - 19/03/2011 05:56:19 PM 559 Views
Fain must have been originally one of many, A great many. - 13/03/2011 04:43:15 PM 874 Views
Re: But if Ishamael was completely free at that stage, why didn't he just take the boys himself? - 13/03/2011 06:41:42 PM 649 Views

Reply to Message