Active Users:341 Time:02/05/2024 09:09:47 PM
Why should you care. Just stop reading the series. RabidWombat Send a noteboard - 28/04/2011 09:45:17 PM
I was disappointed by Towers of Midnight, but the reasons had little to do with Sanderson's "failure" to "accurately portray" terribly written and two-dimensional characters created by Jordan or his "consistency errors".

I was disappointed for two reasons: (1) the book was poorly edited, with typos everywhere and (2) the story was turning out to be entirely too predictable, mundane and derivative.


I just don't get why people care about typos, unless they are an editor of course. Nor do I understand about people caring about predictability. I like surprises, but I also like it when an author tells me he is going to do something then goes ahead and does it. It is much harder for the author to live up to the anticipation but if he/she does the payoff is greater for it.

I don't think that WoT is mundane; I would argue that it is precisely where it is different that it is most hated. "Mundane" is one of those words, like "boring", that has no objective meaning. We throw it at anything we don't like when we are too lazy to defend our opinions with something we can defend as fact.

As far as being derivative, everything is derivative. If it wasn't derivative it would be unconnected with culture and society and therefore useless.

The first problem is of course a problem for Tor to resolve, because they obviously needed a bit more time in the proofreading. This could also, of course, have resolved any "consistency" problems without requiring the replacement writer to re-read the series.

The second problem is really ultimately a problem with Jordan's vision. No real unexpected twists have been encountered for some time and plotlines are resolving with a sort of boring inevitability. Everyone lives and good will triumph because evil is dumb. Even if Sanderson were to re-read the series ten times, nothing could fix that.


Again, I don't care about unexpected twists. Unexpected twists are for lazy authors catering to lazy readers. In the real world, evil IS dumb. It is the mostly good and the neutral that do the most damage, though. RJ doesn't care to glamorize evil and I strongly agree.

As a result, I'm in the exact opposite camp as you. I just want the damn thing to end and get "closure" to a series that I now at times wish I had never wasted time or money on. The bright spots of Wheel of Time for me now are (1) meeting some great people at wotmania and continuing to talk to them on RAFO and (2) getting introduced to Sanderson's own books, which have been enjoyable reads. The rest is just tedium at this point.


I just don't get why you care. I remember quitting one book at the ninety percent mark (I think it was called the stone and the flute). My only regret is that I didn't realize it was a horrible book before then. If you don't like it then don't read it. Stop torturing yourself.

And if you can, I personally would prefer if you didn't torture others about it as well. Personally, I love the WoT for what it is, and find it one of the few books that I can stomach. I won't pretend that my opinion is better than yours. Nor do I mind when people give some actual reason why they dislike WoT, including evidence. But the use of nebulous words such as 'tedium', 'flat characters', 'predictable', 'mundane', and 'derivative', is useless and egregious without evidence to back it up.
Reply to message
Is it just me, or is Sanderson's re-read of WoT taking an inordinate amount of time? - 25/04/2011 08:35:10 PM 2049 Views
I would prefer it if he re-read it 5 times. I don't mind waiting. - 25/04/2011 08:41:31 PM 1009 Views
Same - 26/04/2011 01:12:58 AM 883 Views
I would love BS to get a better handle on the characters as well. - 26/04/2011 05:42:24 PM 865 Views
My problems with the series have little or nothing to do with Sanderson. - 27/04/2011 10:50:15 PM 747 Views
Why should you care. Just stop reading the series. - 28/04/2011 09:45:17 PM 856 Views
It's not like he's just reading for the hell of it. - 25/04/2011 09:31:18 PM 1070 Views
Then what the hell is Maria being employed for? *NM* - 27/04/2011 10:50:46 PM 399 Views
As a backup that he can go to when he can't take time to reread. - 27/04/2011 11:15:48 PM 784 Views
He probably doesn't think he can afford to skim; which bits are the trivial ones? - 26/04/2011 04:36:56 AM 812 Views
Sanderson of all people should know what bits are trivial by now - 27/04/2011 10:52:00 PM 668 Views
Maybe, but better safe than sorry. - 28/04/2011 03:28:19 PM 727 Views
Trivial is in the eye of the beholder. - 28/04/2011 09:52:52 PM 766 Views
*dry* but imagine if he got those skimmable parts WRONG!! - 26/04/2011 04:41:23 PM 753 Views
One persons "skimmable parts" is another persons treasure. - 26/04/2011 06:02:35 PM 734 Views
Oh, I don't mind how much time he spends. - 27/04/2011 05:07:42 AM 666 Views
I would guess that he's doing this. - 26/04/2011 06:06:42 PM 806 Views
It'd be interesting to see his desk - 27/04/2011 05:10:28 AM 763 Views
Heh. No kidding. - 27/04/2011 04:18:53 PM 711 Views
I prefer him to complete his re-read and have enough time for a good series of round(s) for editing - 26/04/2011 05:06:22 PM 927 Views
YES - 27/04/2011 10:57:50 PM 739 Views
not everyone can read and retain a book in a day like i can - 26/04/2011 05:51:39 PM 920 Views
Little league, haha (mostly jk) - 14/05/2011 10:11:45 AM 815 Views
He has said that he is starting to write the book since it's taking so long. - 28/04/2011 05:13:09 AM 784 Views
Wish he wouldn't rush... *NM* - 07/05/2011 08:58:18 PM 518 Views
newest update form him about this - 29/04/2011 05:57:40 AM 818 Views

Reply to Message