Active Users:310 Time:02/05/2024 09:32:32 PM
Well... Ashaman_Luc Send a noteboard - 11/12/2011 08:53:26 PM
If you're going to be critic to someone on his lack of knowledge on a subject, and be rude, I suggest you get your facts right.

And responding I'm a nerd just proves how puerile and juvenile the majority of your posts are. While you do have some very good arguements on some subjet, your tone and choice of words is poor.

I wonder if you would have the nerve or guts to say half of what you write here in our faces...


Everybody knows that WoT = Lotr 7.0 or 'Lotr on steroids';). There's nothing wrong with it, Tolkien was in similar situation (see myths from 800-1400). Of course there are a few twists: Mr. Jordan put The Scouring of the Shire into Book 4 (Perrin vs WC) instead the last book, Rand (Frodo) will go to Valinor (another planet/another dimension) etc.

Book1 - The Hobbt
Book 2 - Fellowship of the Ring
Book 3 - Two Towers
Book 4 - Return of the King
See?
So, I have got an idea this morning.

Mistake number one. Some of us (me, people who think like me), are good at that sort of thing. The rest of you should really not try it. Just stick to stuff you're good at, like complaining about how narrow my view of Egwene, politics or morality is.

WoT is our future, right? There will be big battles in our future and in the end there will be a huge radioactive war. The human race will split into two parts: 'original' humans (Ogiers) and mutants (Rand and co.)
Dammit! I warned you! Now look what you did. Anyway, for that to be true, we'd have erogenous zones on our ears. The only way you could possibly think this is if you're some sort of ear slut, who gets off on rubbing a partner's ears and having yours rubbed in return. You are a filthy, filthy individual. You disgust me.

Could this be the big twist?
EWWW! Is that how you perverted ear-whores reach climax? This is family board. We don't need any of that smut.
Reply to message
Ogiers = real humans, Rand and co. = hobbits? - 09/12/2011 05:44:37 PM 1271 Views
No *NM* - 09/12/2011 08:31:02 PM 508 Views
+1 *NM* - 09/12/2011 08:44:19 PM 367 Views
+∞^2 *NM* - 09/12/2011 09:38:41 PM 319 Views
thank you *NM* - 11/12/2011 11:24:24 PM 419 Views
Nah, and Wot =/= LOTR on steroids - 10/12/2011 01:24:31 AM 822 Views
Also referenced: Queen Elizabeth, Ann Landers, John Glenn, Sally Ride, and the Mercedes-Benz. *NM* - 10/12/2011 05:02:21 AM 425 Views
And Elaida is clearly Ann Coulter. - 15/12/2011 06:16:06 PM 631 Views
+1000 *NM* - 30/12/2011 05:49:50 PM 332 Views
Scouring the Shire WAS in Book 4 for Tolkien as well. Read the damn books already. - 10/12/2011 05:06:03 AM 727 Views
It was in Book 6 of the LotR. - 10/12/2011 07:39:57 AM 721 Views
Sorry but not true. LOTR is seperate from The Hobbit. - 10/12/2011 02:08:23 PM 684 Views
Nerds - 11/12/2011 02:45:14 AM 791 Views
you say that like its a bad thing - 11/12/2011 09:36:27 AM 1028 Views
Well... - 11/12/2011 08:53:26 PM 727 Views
I don't see why that last part is relevant. - 11/12/2011 09:54:26 PM 654 Views

Reply to Message