ToM's darkness was weakened by the fact that we've already seen Rand's epiphany in tGS. I still enjoyed finding out how the story approached its final chapter, but the pacing was all off.
And I don't mean anti-climactic in the sense that the whole story is ruined, but the Rand arc has lost much of its oomph. He's already gone over his hump, and is ready to get down to business. We've seen the light at the end of the tunnel a book too soon, IMO.
And I don't mean anti-climactic in the sense that the whole story is ruined, but the Rand arc has lost much of its oomph. He's already gone over his hump, and is ready to get down to business. We've seen the light at the end of the tunnel a book too soon, IMO.
Post-aMoL, will someone assemble a chronological way to read the final three books as one?
- 07/06/2012 04:48:34 PM
3928 Views
Why it "might be worthwhile"? *NM*
- 07/06/2012 11:20:59 PM
606 Views
Because the way tGS and ToM currently work together feels anti-climactic.
- 08/06/2012 03:26:58 PM
1195 Views
I hate the edit/reply button positioning... ugh. User error. *NM*
- 08/06/2012 03:44:53 PM
675 Views
Bah. Five years into lurking/posting and I still mess this up. *NM*
- 08/06/2012 03:45:28 PM
725 Views
I don't agree. *NM*
- 09/06/2012 11:08:46 PM
589 Views
Probably not. Sounds lame
- 08/06/2012 02:56:22 AM
1031 Views
It's not going to happen, but how is it lame? It's how RJ intended the story to be. *NM*
- 10/06/2012 10:26:53 PM
573 Views
We'll have to wait and see how much AMoL overlaps with the other two books.
- 08/06/2012 01:46:15 PM
1187 Views
Shouldn't be done.
- 09/06/2012 01:40:51 PM
1349 Views
I believe the point is that BS's structure ruined the story somewhat
- 09/06/2012 01:53:29 PM
1044 Views
The books were meant to be chronological. Their splitting changed that. *NM*
- 10/06/2012 10:26:22 PM
2822 Views
Sanderson actually stated on Twitter quite some time ago that he had considered doing this.
- 11/06/2012 03:18:26 PM
1059 Views

*NM*