The way I look at it is ... when a man and a woman link, they each act like an angreal to the other, so they both get a boost in strength.
Examples:
First, let's say that any sort of linking results in a 10% loss in the combined strength.
1) 2_Woman link.
Let's say each woman alone is of strength 1 unit.
Then, the total strength of the circle is (1+1)*0.9 = 1.8 units of saidar.
2) 1_Man + 1_Woman link.
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when one man and and one woman link, they each increase the other's individual strength by 50% (the angreal effect of mixed-gender circles).
Then, the leader of the circle has access to 1*1.5*0.9 = 1.35 units of saidin and 1*1.5*0.9 = 1.35 units of saidar, for a total strength of 2.7 units.
In this case the leader can throw a saidin fireball that is 35% more potent than he could have generated alone, without even tapping into the saidar that he has access to. And, he can combine all of the saidin & saidar he has access to into one fireball that is 170% more potent than he could have generated alone.
This explains why mixed-gender circles are better than single-gender circles of the same number & strength of people.
3) 1_Man + 10_Woman link
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when one man and and ten woman link, the 10 women increase the man's individual strength by 50% (the max benefit he can get), but the man only increases the 10 women's individual strength by 5% each (because the 50% benefit he can offer has to be spread out over the 10 women).
4) 9_Man + 10_Woman link (9 is the max # of men that can link with 10 women)
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when 9 men and and 10 woman link, the 10 women increase the 9 men's individual strength by 50% (the 10 women have a combined 10*50%=500% benefit to offer the 9 men - i.e. 500/9=55% per man, but the max benefit a person can get is 50%), but the 9 men only increases the 10 women's individual strength by 45% each (the 9 men have a combined 9*50%=450% to offer then 10 women - i.e. 450%/10=45% per woman).
3) & 4) explains why the most potent mixed-gender circles are those that have as near as possible the same number of men as women (as the Guide explains). For example, a 37-woman/35-man link is more potent than a 66-woman/6-man link, as we're told in the Guide. My understand is that this is true even when the sum of the indiviudal strengths of each member, in each case, is the same.
Having said all that ... I don't think mixed gender circles actually increase each member's strength, as I've stated above. Rather, I think what happens is that each person becomes more effective/precise/potent with the amount of saidin/saidar he/she can actually channel (or have channeled through them), so that they are effectively stronger without actually being stronger. The net effect is the same, though, and I think it's easier to understand if you think of it as if their strengths increased.
	Examples:
First, let's say that any sort of linking results in a 10% loss in the combined strength.
1) 2_Woman link.
Let's say each woman alone is of strength 1 unit.
Then, the total strength of the circle is (1+1)*0.9 = 1.8 units of saidar.
2) 1_Man + 1_Woman link.
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when one man and and one woman link, they each increase the other's individual strength by 50% (the angreal effect of mixed-gender circles).
Then, the leader of the circle has access to 1*1.5*0.9 = 1.35 units of saidin and 1*1.5*0.9 = 1.35 units of saidar, for a total strength of 2.7 units.
In this case the leader can throw a saidin fireball that is 35% more potent than he could have generated alone, without even tapping into the saidar that he has access to. And, he can combine all of the saidin & saidar he has access to into one fireball that is 170% more potent than he could have generated alone.
This explains why mixed-gender circles are better than single-gender circles of the same number & strength of people.
3) 1_Man + 10_Woman link
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when one man and and ten woman link, the 10 women increase the man's individual strength by 50% (the max benefit he can get), but the man only increases the 10 women's individual strength by 5% each (because the 50% benefit he can offer has to be spread out over the 10 women).
4) 9_Man + 10_Woman link (9 is the max # of men that can link with 10 women)
Let's say each person alone is of strength 1 unit.
And let's say that, when 9 men and and 10 woman link, the 10 women increase the 9 men's individual strength by 50% (the 10 women have a combined 10*50%=500% benefit to offer the 9 men - i.e. 500/9=55% per man, but the max benefit a person can get is 50%), but the 9 men only increases the 10 women's individual strength by 45% each (the 9 men have a combined 9*50%=450% to offer then 10 women - i.e. 450%/10=45% per woman).
3) & 4) explains why the most potent mixed-gender circles are those that have as near as possible the same number of men as women (as the Guide explains). For example, a 37-woman/35-man link is more potent than a 66-woman/6-man link, as we're told in the Guide. My understand is that this is true even when the sum of the indiviudal strengths of each member, in each case, is the same.
Having said all that ... I don't think mixed gender circles actually increase each member's strength, as I've stated above. Rather, I think what happens is that each person becomes more effective/precise/potent with the amount of saidin/saidar he/she can actually channel (or have channeled through them), so that they are effectively stronger without actually being stronger. The net effect is the same, though, and I think it's easier to understand if you think of it as if their strengths increased.
		Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
	
	
	
	
	
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
			Male/Female circles
	    
	         - 25/09/2009 09:33:38 PM
	        1001 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			Yes; somewhat.
	    
	         - 25/09/2009 10:57:35 PM
	        690 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Yes; somewhat.
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 06:19:45 AM
	        606 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Why would saidar surprise him?
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 03:40:23 PM
	        657 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Why would saidar surprise him?
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 06:34:04 PM
	        625 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			He thought they were Aes Sedai who could not channel?  - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM
	        565 Views
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM
	        565 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM
	        565 Views
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM
	        565 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			He did not know they were Aes Sedai until after the mixed weave struck his warding.
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 10:13:10 PM
	        553 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			right...
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 02:56:26 PM
	        622 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
		
			Re: right...
	    
	         - 26/09/2009 07:49:21 PM
	        601 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    		
			Agreed, plus some numbers ...
		
	         - 28/09/2009 07:50:54 PM
	        569 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I don't agree with some of this
	    
	         - 28/09/2009 09:37:13 PM
	        579 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't agree with some of this
	    
	         - 29/09/2009 02:39:46 PM
	        607 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't agree with some of this
	    
	         - 29/09/2009 06:07:56 PM
	        556 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't agree with some of this
	    
	         - 29/09/2009 07:00:28 PM
	        574 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't agree with some of this
	    
	         - 29/09/2009 08:25:19 PM
	        673 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I understand what you're saying ...
	    
	         - 30/09/2009 04:04:17 PM
	        590 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Indeed
	    
	         - 30/09/2009 04:32:37 PM
	        538 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Indeed
	    
	         - 30/09/2009 07:05:13 PM
	        594 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Some proof against your idea...
	    
	         - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM
	        567 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Nice, thanks ...
	    
	         - 01/10/2009 02:00:24 PM
	        546 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Nice, thanks ...
	    
	         - 01/10/2009 04:58:02 PM
	        597 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
 