Active Users:741 Time:15/09/2026 12:17:26 PM
Re: I think its a warding Tor Send a noteboard - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM
The warding is probably inverted, considering Taim can't see it. It's attuned to Demandred and if the flows are directed at him, the ward activates and kills the user. It could be similar to the ward Rand wove around Callandor, promising a nasty surprise to someone who tried to take it.


But then the question is, what does it mean that "the flows are directed at him"? Channeling in his general direction? That would be inconvenient if Taim was directing his flows towards somebody standing between him and Demandred. And how is the direction of channeling even determined? Many complex weaves consists of load of threads twisting around each other, pointing all over the place.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
Binding an angreal - 09/02/2013 05:35:19 PM 2586 Views
I thought Demandred was bluffing Taim - 09/02/2013 06:40:46 PM 1917 Views
I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Channeled - 10/02/2013 12:40:09 AM 2055 Views
Re: I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Chan... - 10/02/2013 07:52:59 PM 1694 Views
Perhaps a booby trap type thing ... Or just a wording issue - 10/02/2013 10:58:53 PM 1737 Views
I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 05:34:09 AM 1834 Views
Re: I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM 2191 Views
I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 01:33:44 AM 1875 Views
You stole my examples. Good job *NM* - 10/02/2013 04:54:32 AM 1016 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 07:49:57 PM 2004 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 05:55:22 AM 2008 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 06:40:28 AM 1654 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:30:30 PM 1717 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:32:00 PM 1678 Views
Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 12/02/2013 03:19:38 PM 1746 Views
Re: Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 13/02/2013 05:01:12 AM 1813 Views

Reply to Message