Active Users:1458 Time:13/09/2026 10:41:14 AM
So...who is Demandred disguised as and who do you think killed Asmodean NOW? Tom Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 07:03:38 PM
My own thoughts:

1. Demandred is a Seanchan general. I arrived at this unscientific conclusion based on the fact that he, Mesaana and Semirhage had a plot together, according to Graendal. Semirhage used to be in Seanchan, Mesaana was in the Tower. Despite Semirhage having been captured and balefired, the Black Ajah STILL knew of the HIGHLY SECRET Seanchan raid ahead of time and managed to escape. This points to Mesaana's surviving co-conspirator, Demandred, being in Seanchan. Furthermore, Demandred claimed to have an army (and liked commanding them), but Graendal (discounting the Seanchan for some reason) couldn't think of any armies big enough left in the world other than the Borderlanders.

It fits that he is commanding armies of Seanchan.

2. Asmodean was killed by Lanfear. She might not even have been Cyndane yet when she did it. She had just fallen into the realm of the Eelfinn and was granted three wishes if she agreed to pay the price. She probably agreed, with one of the wishes being to kill Asmodean, at which point she probably was given temporary access to Caemlyn to kill him.

That's not a new position, but I do agree that Graendal's POV seemed to indicate she hadn't really done much for the Shadow and if she had killed Asmodean, she would have thought about it.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Tom on 02/11/2009 at 07:04:17 PM
Reply to message
So...who is Demandred disguised as and who do you think killed Asmodean NOW? - 02/11/2009 07:03:38 PM 3556 Views
Hmm - 02/11/2009 08:34:40 PM 1443 Views
I think that Graendal did it. Why? - 02/11/2009 10:24:13 PM 1412 Views
Re: I think that Graendal did it. Why? - 02/11/2009 11:55:56 PM 1302 Views
Considering that the Forsaken attend meetings together... - 03/11/2009 12:18:05 AM 1208 Views
After 2nd thought.... I can easily see Demandred's troops being in Seanchan - 03/11/2009 02:36:22 AM 1283 Views
I don't think so - 03/11/2009 04:14:25 AM 1304 Views
Well, it definitely is a wildcard theory - 03/11/2009 07:01:37 AM 1272 Views
Demandred's in Shara - 03/11/2009 07:32:25 AM 1487 Views
I think Shara is pretty much irrelevant to the series. - 03/11/2009 01:43:59 PM 1167 Views
Murandy seems the best guess for Demandred... - 03/11/2009 10:10:54 AM 1309 Views
Re: Murandy seems the best guess for Demandred... - 03/11/2009 10:33:51 AM 2348 Views
Yeah... - 03/11/2009 10:50:05 AM 1234 Views
Re: Yeah... - 03/11/2009 12:36:18 PM 1232 Views
Re: Yeah... - 03/11/2009 01:43:17 PM 1213 Views
Hmmm.... - 04/11/2009 10:45:01 AM 1180 Views
Indeed - 04/11/2009 11:05:18 AM 1241 Views
Graendal is one of those Forsaken... - 04/11/2009 11:50:20 AM 1154 Views
What? - 05/11/2009 07:23:40 AM 1114 Views
Graendal... - 05/11/2009 09:59:53 AM 1526 Views
Re: Graendal... - 05/11/2009 02:52:49 PM 1210 Views
Re: Graendal's last POV - 05/11/2009 03:59:44 PM 1110 Views
Re: Graendal's last POV - 08/12/2009 05:06:52 AM 1005 Views
Hmmm again.... - 04/11/2009 12:05:42 PM 1231 Views
- 05/11/2009 02:53:54 PM 1010 Views
Murandy is a tiny, worthless nation - 03/11/2009 01:46:28 PM 1621 Views
I think... - 03/11/2009 03:02:03 PM 1218 Views
Re: I think... - 03/11/2009 03:47:19 PM 1147 Views
Re: I think... - 03/11/2009 04:19:54 PM 1103 Views
Katerine was still there at the time of the Seanchan attack - 03/11/2009 03:03:53 PM 1158 Views
Well... - 03/11/2009 03:25:13 PM 1304 Views
Hmmm. Don't care about either answer lol! - 08/11/2009 08:48:12 PM 1152 Views
Demandred uses proxies - 22/11/2009 01:09:40 PM 1184 Views
Don't forget that Demandred could be controlling the 200K borderlanders. *NM* - 09/11/2009 02:53:08 PM 568 Views
Very doubtful... - 09/11/2009 03:27:49 PM 1113 Views

Reply to Message