Active Users:591 Time:09/11/2026 10:19:16 PM
There are a couple of flaws in your theory beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 03/11/2009 01:47:39 AM
First, polygamy isn't presented as immoral in WoT- only a bit of culture shock. The normal objections that are often brought against polygamy in our world- abuse, child brides, gender inequality, all of that- don't really apply here.* For the Aiel, there's nothing immoral about 2 wives and a husband, and the examples we've seen have shown that their system is at least as stable as monogamy.

*They don't always apply IRL, either- I know happy, healthy polygamous relationships. But that's neither here nor there.

So, there's no moral imperative to make Rand be with only one woman. And honestly, comparing Rand's odd situation to Rahvin and Graendal mind-raping people doesn't really make sense.


Second, you think that Min, Elayne and Avidendha will merge to be one person? And that this is a GOOD thing? Three discrete individuals, each with their own memories, thoughts and personalities, merged together? Ick.

There are similar things- Rand and LTT, Mat's memories, and the mirrored emotions of Elayne/Birgitte's Warder bond. But Mat only got some memories, and Elayne only sometimes feels Birgitte's emotions- much different than actually BECOMING the same person. Rand and LTT have a bit of the merging thing going on, but it's been presented as NOT a good thing, an insane dead man taking over his body at worst, a ranting voice in his mind at best.

A "merging" of Avidenha, Elayne and Min would NOT be a happy or "moral" ending.

I amuse myself.
Reply to message
tGS - the three shall be one - 02/11/2009 11:52:12 PM 4014 Views
Callandor + Rand + Avihenda + Elayne = Safe usage of Callandor. *NM* - 03/11/2009 01:11:26 AM 1035 Views
Not in this place - 03/11/2009 11:33:44 PM 1280 Views
Min is irrelavent to the passage. - 05/11/2009 01:03:33 AM 1326 Views
Re: Min always matters... - 05/11/2009 09:41:06 AM 1433 Views
*** *NM* - 08/12/2009 03:01:52 PM 593 Views
This is the new most insane theory I've ever read *NM* - 03/11/2009 01:30:43 AM 673 Views
Re: This is the new most insane theory I've ever read - 03/11/2009 04:06:03 PM 1367 Views
Re: This is the new most insane theory I've ever read - 04/11/2009 12:21:10 AM 1794 Views
Thank you Rand ... - 04/11/2009 02:51:10 PM 2044 Views
sorry, this post (not post above!) should be deleted *NM* - 04/11/2009 04:13:32 PM 603 Views
I do not know how to delete my own post *NM* - 05/11/2009 09:46:34 AM 619 Views
I think only admins can delete posts. *NM* - 08/12/2009 03:26:47 PM 593 Views
Re: Thank you Rand ... - 10/11/2009 10:18:57 PM 1182 Views
this makes sense - 14/11/2009 07:42:13 AM 1295 Views
There are a couple of flaws in your theory - 03/11/2009 01:47:39 AM 1389 Views
monogomy, actually - 03/11/2009 02:01:16 AM 1318 Views
I first read this as Rand, LTT and Moridin merging into one. - 03/11/2009 02:16:48 AM 1290 Views
that's actually plausible *NM* - 03/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 610 Views
It might also mean... - 03/11/2009 03:49:10 AM 1300 Views
The three ta'veren is more plausible *NM* - 03/11/2009 08:05:37 AM 579 Views
I agree, although I don't think they'll physicall merge *NM* - 03/11/2009 09:30:43 PM 597 Views
Re: I first read this as Rand, LTT and Moridin merging into one. - 03/11/2009 01:34:17 PM 1282 Views
Everything might happen... - 04/11/2009 04:29:16 PM 1332 Views
NM *NM* - 05/11/2009 06:29:42 PM 588 Views
... - 07/11/2009 12:28:33 PM 1074 Views
What about the three ta'veren? *NM* - 07/11/2009 08:43:58 PM 556 Views
Re: What about the three ta'veren? - 08/11/2009 03:20:53 PM 1410 Views
All true posibilities... - 10/11/2009 09:40:30 AM 1069 Views
Re: All true posibilities... - 11/11/2009 06:14:54 PM 1353 Views
Thought this for awhile - 09/11/2009 01:18:22 AM 1355 Views
Its nirvana, not nirvani! - 09/11/2009 01:26:30 AM 1372 Views
You forgot Bela and Narg. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:04:30 PM 703 Views
Really? Wenches? *NM* - 29/11/2009 07:12:07 AM 612 Views

Reply to Message