Active Users:183 Time:18/06/2024 08:21:24 PM
Thanks everyone. MightyYT Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 01:13:11 PM
Rand's shield was being maintained by 3 AS when he broke free, and he stilled all 3.
But they only did that because they were under attack...the plan was to have him shielded by 6 at all times. But I understand your point..I was off by 2.

The reason only one AS is usually needed to maintain a shield on a woman is because they are usually close in strength. Unless someone is much stronger than the person holding the shield a weaker channeler can shield a stronger one. Cadsuanne decided to have 3 AS hold the shield as an extra precaution, not knowing what tricks Semi might know.


Ok, I wasn't sure if that was the case or if it was another difference between Saidar/Saidin, or if it was just the result of a different author taking over. Thanks for clearing it up.
Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.

Beckett: Me too.

~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Reply to message
A questions about shielding. - 16/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 540 Views
Right, now you're in my domain - although others claim it as their own in error! Mhuhahahaha... - 16/11/2009 08:27:12 PM 440 Views
Nyneave - 16/11/2009 10:43:00 PM 319 Views
Difference between actively and passively holding a shield? - 17/11/2009 06:25:34 AM 279 Views
Logain was "flexing a muscle long unused", in Nynaeve's words... - 17/11/2009 06:55:51 AM 304 Views
It's not quite that simple - 20/11/2009 12:57:01 PM 248 Views
Men and women are different - 16/11/2009 08:34:20 PM 345 Views
men can't link, so how does two men maintain a single shield on a woman? *NM* - 16/11/2009 08:38:14 PM 133 Views
This is a clear example of where the male strength advantage is unquestionable... - 16/11/2009 08:52:08 PM 407 Views
Amusingly... - 16/11/2009 09:27:18 PM 294 Views
Not to mention - 16/11/2009 08:48:09 PM 299 Views
your memory is a little fuzzy, it's actually much simpler than you think - 17/11/2009 02:46:24 AM 321 Views
Thanks everyone. - 17/11/2009 01:13:11 PM 291 Views

Reply to Message