Active Users:610 Time:31/10/2026 08:08:43 AM
Could be in that moment Ryan Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
When all seems lost, and they are making that sacrifice for the Light, they put themselves outside the Dark One's grip. Just an idea.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers) - 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM 1121 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM 941 Views
Yup, totally. - 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM 817 Views
Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM 905 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM 890 Views
Could be in that moment - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM 779 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM 368 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:46:04 PM 344 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:47:40 PM 359 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM 898 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that? - 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM 884 Views
Yeah - 19/11/2009 08:12:16 PM 845 Views
She's tortured - 19/11/2009 08:29:47 PM 889 Views
We know of Talene's escape earlier - 19/11/2009 09:46:35 PM 806 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath. - 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM 771 Views
So George Costanza would make the perfect Aes Sedai? *NM* - 19/11/2009 07:40:06 PM 359 Views
*NM* - 19/11/2009 08:01:12 PM 341 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed." - 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM 900 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding. - 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM 817 Views
Yep. - 19/11/2009 10:43:11 PM 750 Views
Off with her head!!! - 19/11/2009 10:44:28 PM 752 Views
I was thinking... - 20/11/2009 03:20:32 AM 874 Views
Yes, but they probably asked "Have you ever been Black Ajah?" - 20/11/2009 03:24:48 AM 814 Views
Bigger loophole - 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM 869 Views

Reply to Message