Active Users:587 Time:03/08/2025 10:50:11 PM
No. *NM* TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 10:38:19 PM
Reply to message
Mesaana == Silviana ... - 19/11/2009 10:34:45 PM 1102 Views
No. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:36:16 PM 272 Views
No. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:38:19 PM 250 Views
Sure why the hell not... *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 261 Views
I like the way you think *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:17:01 AM 237 Views
Thank you *NM* - 26/11/2009 08:41:04 PM 250 Views
Meh. Yeah, why not? *NM* - 20/11/2009 04:17:46 PM 273 Views
because it's not true *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:59:38 PM 252 Views
Re: Mesaana == Silviana ... - 19/11/2009 11:07:56 PM 772 Views
That's not how speculation works. - 19/11/2009 11:41:55 PM 722 Views
Well, it's how speculation works. Plus, it has charisma! *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:18:48 AM 262 Views
Yes. It is. - 20/11/2009 03:06:04 AM 551 Views
Because I declared it to be so. That is sufficient reason. - 20/11/2009 03:33:54 AM 505 Views
This severely limits any discussion. - 20/11/2009 09:36:17 PM 537 Views
My point exactly . *NM* - 20/11/2009 10:12:06 PM 227 Views
Let me guess - 20/11/2009 12:07:46 AM 662 Views
Yes, the original post was dumb, but... - 20/11/2009 08:09:27 AM 705 Views
Perhaps - 20/11/2009 11:18:56 AM 552 Views
Fails the Sanderson confusion test - 20/11/2009 01:07:43 PM 534 Views
Oh, I see your reasoning. - 20/11/2009 03:14:11 AM 620 Views

Reply to Message