Active Users:1005 Time:14/09/2025 03:24:45 AM
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. Logain Send a noteboard - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM
The damane and sul'dam cannot see the weaves from men. I'd dress up the bonded Asha'man to make them look like tower guards. Then I'd have the Asha'man simply club every sul'dam and damane they see with a mace of air. The Seanchan would have no idea what was hitting them. They'd be focusing all their attention on the circles of women. After all, who could ignore the enormous volumes of power being wielded right in front of your face by the circles of women. That's the secret power of the ASha'man disguised as tower guards. While the seanchan focus on the AS circles, the Asha'man would be extremely deadly.
Reply to message
Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:13:32 AM 1455 Views
Bryne will without a doubt be in charge - 17/12/2009 01:28:02 AM 781 Views
Re: Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:39:32 AM 931 Views
Linking provides another benefit. - 17/12/2009 02:02:05 AM 854 Views
Wow, if that happens, I will be her biggest fan *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:10:01 AM 467 Views
What an utterly stupid idea. - 17/12/2009 11:35:24 AM 780 Views
Your facts are incorrect. - 17/12/2009 02:41:42 PM 820 Views
There is a way to get around the "first strike" limitation. - 17/12/2009 05:25:05 PM 746 Views
another linking advantage - 17/12/2009 02:10:56 AM 723 Views
All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 11:55:55 AM 766 Views
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM 829 Views
Why mace of air? - 17/12/2009 05:58:32 PM 747 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 07:38:55 PM 687 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 08:49:28 PM 645 Views
Why did you post this? - 17/12/2009 09:35:09 AM 813 Views
I have not read Darius Sedai's post. Sorry. *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:49:20 PM 377 Views
What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 04:57:14 PM 617 Views
Re: What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 11:31:06 PM 748 Views
Here it is - 18/12/2009 12:42:45 AM 697 Views
I actually brought it up in an earlier thread too *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:46:56 AM 360 Views
thanks for the credit... PS I'm a guy *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:10:56 AM 415 Views
Ooops - 18/12/2009 12:48:22 AM 724 Views
I'm totally teasing you ... I added the "sedai" to be snarky - 18/12/2009 12:55:51 AM 1135 Views
Yeah, I don't get that: Fantasy gender-nuetral honorific, plus Real World male name = female? - 18/12/2009 05:35:17 AM 771 Views
Cannoli sedai? *NM* - 18/12/2009 02:15:18 PM 721 Views
what about the oaths - 17/12/2009 01:24:57 PM 771 Views
The oaths stand as no bar. - 17/12/2009 02:48:32 PM 748 Views

Reply to Message