Active Users:350 Time:09/07/2025 05:53:28 PM
As above, they don't. redqueen Send a noteboard - 25/12/2009 06:06:28 PM
There was a post about this in the old forum. We worked out that the a'dam was more of a compulsion device than a dedicated linking device, since with a link, one person has to lead and that person is the only one who channels. Sul'dam and damane seem to waver between the two. Though a sul'dam with enough experience and control can control the damane's weaves so well that it looks as though she is doing the channeling herself, she isn't. The weaves, and the Power, still come from the damane.

Sul'dam can allow their damane to channel more-or-less freely, or they can control the weaving completely, or anything in between. But there's no reason why a damane cannot show another a weave. Where did people get that idea?
Reply to message
How long until Elaida is broken and reveals the Travelling Weave to the Seanchan? - 16/12/2009 03:05:44 PM 1051 Views
Knowing Elaida's ego - 16/12/2009 03:30:38 PM 624 Views
Re: Knowing Elaida's ego - 16/12/2009 03:54:28 PM 597 Views
Not long - 16/12/2009 04:21:27 PM 697 Views
I disagree with the Asha'man part - 16/12/2009 06:41:46 PM 632 Views
You misinterpreted me - 17/12/2009 01:38:09 AM 602 Views
OH! I see now what you meant *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:09:13 AM 346 Views
That could be ironic - 17/12/2009 06:27:36 AM 494 Views
Re: That could be ironic - 17/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 547 Views
I'd like to see Tuon do something that helps the good guys - 17/12/2009 05:07:07 PM 522 Views
Maybe never. She still has her foretelling... - 16/12/2009 10:16:44 PM 557 Views
I doubt it - 16/12/2009 10:28:10 PM 622 Views
What lies did Leanne tell? Really, there's no reason to dismiss a redemptive arc for Elaida. - 16/12/2009 10:48:09 PM 958 Views
Re: What lies did Leanne tell? Really, there's no reason to dismiss a redemptive arc for Elaida. - 17/12/2009 12:15:46 AM 584 Views
PS why give Elaida a new name "Suffa" only to have her redeemed? *NM* - 17/12/2009 12:52:13 AM 559 Views
Tuli was redeemed rescued. *NM* - 17/12/2009 12:59:12 AM 265 Views
yes but Suffa has a whole other meaning - 17/12/2009 01:29:37 AM 509 Views
I was mostly kidding. - 17/12/2009 01:37:26 AM 470 Views
Fair enough - 17/12/2009 02:07:00 AM 512 Views
Breaking her won't solve the entire problem. Look at Moghedien's example. - 17/12/2009 12:57:36 AM 546 Views
Brutal, but effective - 17/12/2009 01:31:49 AM 540 Views
If it was that simple... - 17/12/2009 02:14:55 PM 472 Views
not without revealing who she was to the AS - 17/12/2009 06:33:40 PM 794 Views
You're forgetting that Egwene, Nynaeve and Elayne didn't "break" Moghedien. - 17/12/2009 07:48:14 PM 452 Views
good point. I agree on the difficulty of learning from the damane *NM* - 17/12/2009 06:20:51 AM 255 Views
I think there is a degree of over-complexity you are bringing to this. - 17/12/2009 07:41:28 PM 575 Views
You're mis-understanding something - 17/12/2009 08:04:11 PM 465 Views
No they don't - 17/12/2009 08:07:59 PM 480 Views
As above, they don't. - 25/12/2009 06:06:28 PM 544 Views
I don't think Elaida will need to be broken to reveal it... - 18/12/2009 10:47:21 AM 453 Views

Reply to Message