He said:
"following a bell curve distribution in strength."
Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.
"following a bell curve distribution in strength."
Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas
- 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM
2578 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add...
- 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM
1263 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance"
- 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM
950 Views
Here's the real quote
- 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM
999 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence...
- 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM
1001 Views
I also think the quote is specific
- 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM
983 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her
- 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM
1001 Views
Bah
- 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM
945 Views
Who's arguing that?
- 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM
903 Views
What ARE you arguing?
- 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM
973 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote!
- 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM
852 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote!
- 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM
1063 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien?
- 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM
959 Views
You more than imply it with your own list
- 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM
975 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else
- 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM
938 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else
- 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM
1327 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point
- 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM
1110 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point
- 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM
1019 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post
- 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM
1202 Views
Read RJ's quote again...
- 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
904 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post
- 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM
1122 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually
- 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM
967 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable
- 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM
998 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM
901 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM
1040 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM
1091 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM
963 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth
- 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM
907 Views
Dude
- 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM
853 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post
- 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM
914 Views
A reply...
- 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM
929 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range...
- 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM
1082 Views
Re: A reply...
- 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM
1044 Views
I think distance is related to Strength
- 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM
949 Views
Re: A reply...
- 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM
1101 Views
amusing side note
- 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM
908 Views
Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like...
- 04/01/2010 07:03:51 AM
844 Views
Re: Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like...
- 04/01/2010 03:29:47 PM
918 Views
It may sound silly, but did you look at One Power values in the Wheel of Time CCG?
- 05/01/2010 12:56:41 AM
1432 Views
Re: It may sound silly, but did you look at One Power values in the Wheel of Time CCG?
- 05/01/2010 07:33:21 AM
1023 Views


