Active Users:658 Time:04/08/2025 06:19:41 AM
Nothing is perfect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
He said:

"following a bell curve distribution in strength."

Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.


Yeah I know, but let's face it we're all trying to force fit evidence :)

What we have from the books fits to the 21 level list with 11 being the Mean/Median/Mode more closely than trying to fit the average woman at 50% of the strongest...

RJ could simply have been attributing strength to the levels.

Ultimately there is no perfect answer (because RJ wanted the freedom to write as he needed), but IMO this scale works as closely to the evidence as anything I've seen :)

1. It maps to the Strength differences between Egwene and Nynaeve, while still allowing for Moghedien, Tamela and Viendre
2. It explains how/why AS power differences are so wide, but still allows for even larger power gaps at the top levels.
3. It gives plausible reasons for Rand being so much stronger than any woman but allows for dexterity to narrow the gap when the most skilled of channelers face him (i.e. Lanfear could face him easily despite being significantly weaker in raw strength).
4. It shows how 3 weak AS can hold one of the FS
5. It explains how Nynaeve could match Moghedien as far back as TSR and why Egwene/Elayne were so much weaker than Rand.
6. It fits A Bell Curve (granted on levels not absolute strength).
7. It fits with the BWB statement that most channelers were fairly weak (thus the Curve being centered on levels not strength).
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas - 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM 2481 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM 1188 Views
Re: I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 04:37:56 PM 994 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance" - 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 882 Views
Here's the real quote - 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM 940 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence... - 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM 923 Views
I also think the quote is specific - 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM 920 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her - 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM 938 Views
Bah - 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM 895 Views
Who's arguing that? - 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM 845 Views
What ARE you arguing? - 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM 918 Views
Precisely... - 03/01/2010 07:56:24 PM 854 Views
Just like Asmos killer - 03/01/2010 08:00:21 PM 934 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM 799 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM 1010 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien? - 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM 900 Views
You more than imply it with your own list - 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM 920 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM 856 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM 1253 Views
there are no absolutes - 04/01/2010 08:49:46 PM 1308 Views
I agree with Darius Sedai. - 06/01/2010 07:49:10 PM 785 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:46:12 PM 936 Views
Calm down, please... - 03/01/2010 07:11:11 PM 1000 Views
I'm not upset - 03/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 891 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM 1025 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM 942 Views
Which makes sense - 03/01/2010 05:15:24 PM 886 Views
Really? - 03/01/2010 06:09:22 PM 825 Views
All I'm saying is that information on the internet should - 04/01/2010 06:08:27 AM 856 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM 1125 Views
Lanfear quote - 03/01/2010 05:37:50 PM 934 Views
Read RJ's quote again... - 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM 850 Views
Nothing is perfect - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM 1007 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM 1051 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually - 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM 912 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable - 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM 924 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM 842 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM 971 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM 1032 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM 899 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth - 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM 849 Views
Dude - 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM 803 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM 842 Views
Re: Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:49:42 PM 851 Views
Then how can you know? - 04/01/2010 08:17:46 PM 937 Views
A reply... - 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM 860 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range... - 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM 1007 Views
I agree - Aes Sedai are stronger in the Power - 03/01/2010 07:26:45 PM 1191 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM 978 Views
I think distance is related to Strength - 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM 895 Views
Maybe, but to what conclusion? - 03/01/2010 07:29:39 PM 870 Views
OOps, missed part of the quote ... sorry about that! - 03/01/2010 07:59:20 PM 818 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM 1006 Views
Re: A reply... - 04/01/2010 10:10:13 AM 999 Views
So many double standards. - 04/01/2010 09:02:23 PM 887 Views
I agree with most of this - 03/01/2010 08:19:37 PM 979 Views
Re: I agree with most of this - 04/01/2010 10:19:12 AM 920 Views
amusing side note - 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM 842 Views

Reply to Message