Technically, Egwene was wrong to scold the rebels for splitting - the split was the right and necessary thing to do, and that doesn't just change because the Tower is whole now. The WT AS were wrong in their support of Elaida; misguided and ignorant, true, but still in the wrong.
However, pointing out this fact would achieve nothing. If anything, it would tick off the remaining WT Aes Sedai, and threaten Egwene's grip on authority. What she needed to do was demonstrate that she was impartial to sides - neither the rebels nor loyal Aes Sedai mattered; her loyalty was to the Tower. To achieve that end, it was a wise political move to 'scold' the rebels a bit.
She was effectively reassuring those Aes Sedai who stayed in Tar Valon, that there wasn't going to be a radical change in hierarchy. She was telling them that she could see things from their point of view.
I would liken it to a mother who scold her children when they get in a fight. It doesn't matter who was right or wrong, you shouldn't have been fighting.
However, pointing out this fact would achieve nothing. If anything, it would tick off the remaining WT Aes Sedai, and threaten Egwene's grip on authority. What she needed to do was demonstrate that she was impartial to sides - neither the rebels nor loyal Aes Sedai mattered; her loyalty was to the Tower. To achieve that end, it was a wise political move to 'scold' the rebels a bit.
She was effectively reassuring those Aes Sedai who stayed in Tar Valon, that there wasn't going to be a radical change in hierarchy. She was telling them that she could see things from their point of view.
I would liken it to a mother who scold her children when they get in a fight. It doesn't matter who was right or wrong, you shouldn't have been fighting.
"Take the Gleeman!" Rand and Mat cried, throwing Thom to the Myrddraal. Then they ran away as fast as they could, and Thom's screams quickly faded into the distance along with any inconvenient feelings of guilt.
Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 05:13:59 PM
7019 Views
She was right, as long as she never mentions it again
- 12/01/2010 05:19:38 PM
890 Views
I didn't expect it, but it was absolutely the right thing for her to do.
- 12/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
904 Views
She was absolutely right and I love to hear good beratings.
- 12/01/2010 06:49:56 PM
844 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
342 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
342 Views
If the berating sucked, I would have complained. But it was pretty good to hear/read. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:33:29 PM
412 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 06:58:40 PM
844 Views
Reasonable in terms of power politics, but still somewhat deceitful.
- 12/01/2010 07:06:33 PM
869 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 07:20:30 PM
879 Views
I doubt it.
- 12/01/2010 09:58:40 PM
770 Views
It was a political move. It was the right political move, but not "morally" right.
- 12/01/2010 08:03:27 PM
804 Views
Ugly, IMO, but a keen political manuever
- 12/01/2010 09:31:48 PM
763 Views
It was very clear where her sympathies lie. A lot of it was superficial.
- 12/01/2010 10:41:09 PM
923 Views
She didn't mention/berate the 300+ AS who ignored this whole facade of a plotline.
- 13/01/2010 01:27:02 AM
787 Views
it's not like they were there to berate! *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:10:49 AM
330 Views
Wait until they come back and she slams them for "ignoring the Tower in its hour of need." *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:20:55 AM
330 Views
She should
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
851 Views
They probably had more important matters than the privileges of a tiny group of powerful women.
- 14/01/2010 12:11:04 AM
812 Views
right, they were very very busy doing a whole lot of nothing
- 14/01/2010 12:13:06 AM
748 Views
Keeping an eye on the transition between rulers of the most powerful country IS more important
- 18/01/2010 12:19:17 PM
930 Views
they've been coming and going for months ... with no indication of what they are really up too
- 19/01/2010 06:24:27 AM
772 Views
What part of "keeping an eye on" suggests action or interference?
- 22/01/2010 01:38:52 PM
765 Views
It depends what she does next. It was really a tactical thing and politics can excuse the hypocrisy
- 13/01/2010 04:20:06 AM
870 Views

