That given the weight of cuendillar relative to the size, it would take extreme strength to manage such a shield and the impediment to movement would be too much of a liability on a battlefield regardless of who (ie: blacksmith-strong human or Ogier) was trying to lug it around.
I don't remember anything about Cuendillar being really heavy, and if it is the case, have them attached to wheels, and rolled out to the front lines and then positioned there. Nobody has to hold them, but Archers could line up behind them, step out and shoot, and they'd protect against most minor Power attacks (fireballs and whatnot) pretty well.
Or they could just make a cuendillar armored steam-powered Tank. That'd be cool too.
But I vaguely thought Cuendillar was lighter than the original iron. I wish we still had the Wotmania Reference desk, that'd be handy right now. Unless someone has some Cuendillar quotes handy.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
2-7-1
Cuendillar and Perpetual Gateways
- 14/01/2010 03:32:15 PM
1655 Views
I'm still not sure if cuendillar would be "destroyed" or "remain"
- 14/01/2010 03:55:00 PM
841 Views
Quick question ...
- 15/01/2010 01:34:21 AM
844 Views
No - cuendillar just gets stronger the more powerful a force you use against it
- 15/01/2010 07:55:34 PM
761 Views
Cuendillar shields
- 14/01/2010 04:57:45 PM
847 Views
Wasn't the consensus...
- 14/01/2010 05:04:50 PM
843 Views
Really?
- 14/01/2010 05:30:40 PM
752 Views
Re: Really?
- 14/01/2010 05:52:45 PM
708 Views
Even so...
- 14/01/2010 06:30:35 PM
778 Views
Not sure, but the discussion might be saved somewhere (maybe in my e-mail somehow)
- 14/01/2010 07:12:42 PM
906 Views
Lack of Creativity / Flame
- 14/01/2010 07:31:32 PM
848 Views
*shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 08:48:13 PM
795 Views
Re: *shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 09:23:36 PM
793 Views
Re: *shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 09:36:26 PM
739 Views
let's do some quick math to see how feasible this is...
- 15/01/2010 12:16:02 AM
664 Views
Again, Lack of Creativity
- 15/01/2010 12:54:01 AM
695 Views
right cause they are full of new ideas in WoT!
- 15/01/2010 12:57:52 AM
658 Views
Huh? Are you saying that...
- 15/01/2010 01:49:23 AM
704 Views
It's not just a matter of creativity
- 15/01/2010 03:42:38 AM
777 Views
Are you trying to be funny?
- 15/01/2010 09:22:18 AM
748 Views
- 15/01/2010 09:22:18 AM
748 Views
I think what people are saying to you (at least what I am saying)
- 15/01/2010 07:58:31 PM
858 Views
The vast majority of WoT folk aren't particularly innovative
- 15/01/2010 08:02:52 PM
672 Views
Pretty much. I think their religion is not doing anything helpful with the Power.
- 15/01/2010 09:13:49 PM
644 Views
Mail is obviously out of the question...
- 15/01/2010 12:54:32 AM
756 Views
Create a ter'angreal that can open gateways wherever it is pointed and triggered.
- 14/01/2010 04:59:28 PM
694 Views
Maybe this was one of the violent games played for sport during The Collapse *NM*
- 14/01/2010 05:14:05 PM
326 Views
Or they could just tie the gateway weave off, like Sammael did in CoS, and Rand did in KoD...
- 14/01/2010 07:11:56 PM
887 Views
Thanks; I thought this was the case but couldnt recall the sections.
- 14/01/2010 07:13:32 PM
655 Views
True... I forgot...
- 14/01/2010 07:18:25 PM
753 Views
Tied-off weaves dont last forever
- 14/01/2010 07:39:53 PM
694 Views
Why would this mean that the gateway weave doesn't need to be maintained? *NM*
- 17/01/2010 03:22:58 PM
317 Views
Because even if it wasn't tied off, it'd get stuck around the cuendillar doorway, unable to close. *NM*
- 22/01/2010 09:07:34 PM
311 Views
But RJ said that cuendillar could not pass into a gateway, didn't he?
- 23/01/2010 11:53:35 AM
633 Views

*NM*