Active Users:472 Time:02/05/2025 01:26:42 PM
Re: I didn't get that at all RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 12:12:04 PM
It's funny how two different people can read the same piece and come away with completely different viewpoints. I interpreted that blog post to mean that things are going pretty good, he feels refreshed etc etc but as in any long term project stuff can happen to cause setbacks. This is always the case with EVERY long term project, witness the CERN collider. I think he put that in to remind us of that. I think it will be super cool if he gets AMoLII out by Jan, giving us a year between books but to be truthful I've been more expecting 18 months between the books.


I'm not saying he thinks a delay is inevitable, just that he can imagine one cropping up. It seems striking to me that he never felt the need to make a similar caveat while he was writing TGS, though that could be because Jordan had left more of it in completed form to begin with which left him with less original material to write than he has on his plate now.
Reply to message
New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 11:49:10 AM 1147 Views
Some good info there - 03/09/2009 12:03:14 PM 632 Views
I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:04:57 PM 643 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:12:04 PM 626 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 02:21:01 PM 584 Views
Another curious thing - 03/09/2009 01:05:35 PM 704 Views
Nothing curious there. - 03/09/2009 02:46:23 PM 600 Views
Aha. So I was, in fact, misremembering. Thanks! - 03/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 583 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 01:36:07 PM 603 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:09:27 PM 578 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:20:44 PM 621 Views
Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 07:11:19 PM 568 Views
Come what may - 03/09/2009 07:20:41 PM 553 Views
Re: Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 08:49:52 PM 536 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 08:34:54 PM 702 Views

Reply to Message