Active Users:533 Time:30/10/2026 10:32:14 PM
Re: Birgette & Gaial? GateKeeper Send a noteboard - 10/02/2010 05:17:59 AM
From what I gathered, this "little thing" is something that BS has not seen discussed before. I think, even in my casual glances at the boards, that topic has been spoken of often. I could be wrong.
On the same kind of train. I read some things around saying that the Tinker Massacre might be the "little thing". While I really don't think this is the case, it came to a point were people referred to the Tinkers blood, and the " Tell The Dragon Reborn" . They all talked about this as a warning FROM the Tinker to the DR. As in "Tell the Dragon Reborn that there will be 10000 Trollocs that are waiting over the ridge." I'm probably wrong but I always thought it was Fain that killed the Tinkers, and that the "Tell the Dragon Reborn" was a THREAT. As in "Whoever finds this, tell the Dragon Reborn Im slaughtering innocents and he knows there is only one dude that currently does that. Love, Fain." Someone please correct me?


GATE
Reply to message
Birgette & Gaial? - 10/02/2010 04:37:51 AM 1409 Views
Re: Birgette & Gaial? - 10/02/2010 05:17:59 AM 1089 Views
RJ indicated that Cain won't play a role at TG... - 10/02/2010 09:28:21 AM 1031 Views
Re: RJ indicated that Cain won't play a role at TG... - 10/02/2010 06:52:52 PM 1153 Views
DING! DING! DING! - 10/02/2010 09:48:37 PM 1139 Views
although - 10/02/2010 09:58:38 PM 975 Views
Re: although - 11/02/2010 01:22:16 AM 966 Views
Re: although - 11/02/2010 02:15:24 AM 896 Views
Re: DING! DING! DING! - 10/02/2010 10:17:51 PM 906 Views
- 11/02/2010 09:11:23 AM 864 Views
Am I the only one who picked up on the Gaidal=Olver thing??? *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:05:00 AM 398 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:45:36 AM 389 Views
Gaidal = Olver has been debunked by RJ. - 11/02/2010 06:07:25 AM 878 Views
Gaidal = Olver - 12/02/2010 01:12:04 AM 1096 Views
where did he debunk it? *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:30:16 AM 407 Views
Here's the quote from RJ - 14/02/2010 12:53:19 AM 866 Views

Reply to Message