Active Users:2759 Time:03/05/2026 01:11:16 AM
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 16/03/2010 01:31:02 AM
Also, i still have a problem with the theory that balefire explains the DO's inability to ressurect Asmo b/c of RJ's "How AND Where" rule. If balefire was the only reason for the absolute death then the theory cant be correct b/c it doesnt rely on a "where".

Also in asking how i could be wrong about my idea that it was not a channeler i tried to address the "where" requirement" and thought that perhaps with the "one step" asmo was standing partially in and partially out of the gateway and therefore was in two places at once. if his sould is two places at once when he is killed did that satisfy the "where"?
Reply to message
Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 12:43:53 AM 921 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:05:08 AM 682 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:24:51 AM 652 Views
The Forsaken have almost literally made a living out of using the Power with incredible speed. - 16/03/2010 04:26:08 AM 719 Views
Any good channeler is very fast with using the Power - 16/03/2010 03:40:17 PM 650 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:31:02 AM 661 Views
Okay... - 16/03/2010 01:54:06 AM 589 Views
Re: Okay... - 16/03/2010 02:01:51 AM 578 Views
Re: Okay... - 16/03/2010 04:16:52 AM 593 Views
The problem with this theory is that Bel'al was irrevocably killed by balefire. - 16/03/2010 03:43:21 PM 612 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:49:14 AM 649 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:52:16 AM 603 Views
Re: Might have a new Asmo theory - 16/03/2010 01:04:46 PM 620 Views
It doesn't really matter if the attacker was "sensed" - 16/03/2010 04:45:31 PM 610 Views

Reply to Message