Active Users:412 Time:17/06/2025 01:03:25 AM
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* Cannoli Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM
does that mean they all lost the ageless look?
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1553 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 370 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 849 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 726 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 766 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 695 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 1166 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 861 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 1120 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 749 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 742 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 779 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 701 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 629 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 683 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 325 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 302 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 854 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 661 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 645 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 642 Views

Reply to Message