Active Users:752 Time:06/08/2025 12:13:24 AM
Not for my purposes. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM
But still, the effect is the same, isn't it?

The gateway stays open.



My point in asking was to determine if permanently tied off gateways could be set up as transportation/communication aids for normal people, and to relieve the pressure on the channelers from having to do all the gateways each time one is needed. Since Rand's method of blocking Aviendha's gateway was failing visibly, it would not suffice for the purpose which I would have used a tied off gateway. I was seeking confirmation that if you wove a gateway and tied it off, it would stay that way indefinitely. I will be posting a thread fairly soon contemplating the possibilities of this weave, and I wanted to see if it was possible or if I was forgetting something in the books that rendered the idea moot.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Can gateways be tied off? - 07/04/2010 11:52:42 PM 1585 Views
hmm - 08/04/2010 12:29:41 AM 746 Views
Re: Can gateways be tied off? - 08/04/2010 12:56:04 AM 813 Views
Good points. - 08/04/2010 02:51:55 AM 758 Views
Sammael - 08/04/2010 01:49:08 AM 803 Views
I'd imagine that it'd be possible. - 08/04/2010 03:46:13 AM 844 Views
Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 06:25:28 AM 1084 Views
Interesting - 08/04/2010 11:03:08 AM 833 Views
yes about the warder bond - 08/04/2010 02:13:19 PM 694 Views
I always thought the gateway trick was Brandon's too - 08/04/2010 05:23:52 PM 647 Views
Re: Interesting - 09/04/2010 02:36:43 PM 618 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 03:26:37 PM 683 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 11:20:30 PM 629 Views
Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 08:36:04 PM 643 Views
Re: Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 09:03:35 PM 687 Views
Aha! Pie on my face! - 09/04/2010 12:42:47 AM 679 Views
Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM 644 Views
Re: Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 10:38:05 AM 609 Views

Reply to Message