Active Users:336 Time:06/07/2020 08:39:03 AM
Whats the big deal?? Tredogg - 23/01/2003 11:00:08 AM

As far as I can tell the man is in a position to help people that have aids, and himself having aids can help him be more compassionate to those people.

As for his religious beliefs, everyone has there own opions about aids and homosexuality. And it is not wrong to have religous beliefs. Half the religions in the world condemn homosexuality. This dosnt mean that he cannot perform his job. He simply believes that homosexuality is wrong. And lets face it every liberal in america is going to jump down on this guy because of this.

In todays politically correct society "Gay plague" is going to be labeled harsh and discrimintive. Although I dont argue that Thacker was right in saying this I do think that he is not fully wrong in saying it either. After all Aids was first seen spread heavily within homosexuals, especially gay men. So before you condemn this man for what you think he is saying do some research yourself.

You can start here.

I comend him for standing up for his faith, something most american know nothing about.

Aids 20 years of research




Aids 20 years of research
View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Ugh... (edit with good news) - 23/01/2003 10:12:45 AM 268 Views
I saw that article in the morning paper... - 23/01/2003 10:39:19 AM 27 Views
His appointment does seem to be very badly wrong *NM* - 23/01/2003 10:49:11 AM 5 Views
Whats the big deal?? - 23/01/2003 11:00:08 AM 37 Views
but it didnt begin in gay men - 23/01/2003 11:02:44 AM 33 Views
No - 23/01/2003 11:06:09 AM 23 Views
true - 23/01/2003 11:09:11 AM 19 Views
Im not sure. - 23/01/2003 11:16:04 AM 21 Views
more aids sufferers in the world are now women - 23/01/2003 11:17:44 AM 16 Views
Not hearsay - 23/01/2003 11:20:35 AM 19 Views
Yeah... - 23/01/2003 12:21:56 PM 15 Views
I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:23:29 AM 21 Views
Re: I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:26:17 AM 14 Views
ok... - 23/01/2003 11:35:50 AM 14 Views
Re: ok... - 23/01/2003 11:47:50 AM 10 Views
I'd guess it's because he appears closed minded and will... - 23/01/2003 11:37:55 AM 13 Views
Sorry, posted in wrong place *NM* - 23/01/2003 02:34:36 PM 7 Views
sigh - 23/01/2003 11:00:39 AM 21 Views
They claim... - 23/01/2003 11:04:04 AM 23 Views
dimwitted? - 23/01/2003 11:24:19 AM 21 Views
Merely in his stances on... - 23/01/2003 11:32:49 AM 18 Views
then - 23/01/2003 11:36:44 AM 15 Views
Once again... - 23/01/2003 11:46:21 AM 13 Views
I disagree. - 23/01/2003 11:39:45 AM 17 Views
*sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:49:46 AM 18 Views
Re: *sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:52:53 AM 14 Views
Gladly... - 23/01/2003 12:15:52 PM 15 Views
sigh *NM* - 23/01/2003 12:02:01 PM 4 Views
This is wrong in so many ways - 23/01/2003 12:22:12 PM 17 Views
Geeze, people - 23/01/2003 02:35:32 PM 22 Views
As long as we're clear - 23/01/2003 02:57:17 PM 19 Views
We're clear - 24/01/2003 11:54:47 AM 6 Views
Urm... - 23/01/2003 03:02:16 PM 18 Views
Re: Urm... - 24/01/2003 01:25:24 PM 10 Views
true 'nuff. - 24/01/2003 01:51:12 PM 8 Views
Come on... - 24/01/2003 02:29:10 PM 7 Views
excellent, i am pleased he withdrew. *NM* - 23/01/2003 03:55:22 PM 2 Views
Things like this anger me.. - 26/01/2003 07:03:21 AM 8 Views
I think he knows - 26/01/2003 10:28:38 AM 6 Views