Active Users:342 Time:06/07/2020 08:53:24 AM
Re: Urm... Xoe - 24/01/2003 01:25:24 PM

How is what you claim "we've" done any different than the broad generalization you just made?

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I meant that those who responded to the post generally said things along the lines of "What a horrible person with horrible beliefs." I just thought that that was a very extreme stance to take considering the fact that the whole article is based on second- and third-hand information about the guy.

I dissagree with his stance, and I have followed up more than just reading that article... his web site is available. I also do not associate him with all Christians. I am a Christian, and I don't associate his stances with my or others beliefs. He just happens to use "Christianity", at least his understanding of it, as a basis of many of his arguments.

I know. I happen to disagree with him too. In my school, we had text books from Bob Jones University Press. We called them "Biased Bobs" because they presented a very slanted view of history, biology, etc.

My point was that, regardless of who this guy is, judging him based on one article isn't a very fair thing to do.


:: I am the speaker at the dawn of the age
:: and I stand at the door to the west.

~X~




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Ugh... (edit with good news) - 23/01/2003 10:12:45 AM 268 Views
I saw that article in the morning paper... - 23/01/2003 10:39:19 AM 27 Views
His appointment does seem to be very badly wrong *NM* - 23/01/2003 10:49:11 AM 5 Views
Whats the big deal?? - 23/01/2003 11:00:08 AM 37 Views
but it didnt begin in gay men - 23/01/2003 11:02:44 AM 33 Views
No - 23/01/2003 11:06:09 AM 23 Views
true - 23/01/2003 11:09:11 AM 19 Views
Im not sure. - 23/01/2003 11:16:04 AM 21 Views
more aids sufferers in the world are now women - 23/01/2003 11:17:44 AM 16 Views
Not hearsay - 23/01/2003 11:20:35 AM 19 Views
Yeah... - 23/01/2003 12:21:56 PM 15 Views
I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:23:29 AM 21 Views
Re: I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:26:17 AM 14 Views
ok... - 23/01/2003 11:35:50 AM 14 Views
Re: ok... - 23/01/2003 11:47:50 AM 10 Views
I'd guess it's because he appears closed minded and will... - 23/01/2003 11:37:55 AM 13 Views
Sorry, posted in wrong place *NM* - 23/01/2003 02:34:36 PM 7 Views
sigh - 23/01/2003 11:00:39 AM 21 Views
They claim... - 23/01/2003 11:04:04 AM 23 Views
dimwitted? - 23/01/2003 11:24:19 AM 21 Views
Merely in his stances on... - 23/01/2003 11:32:49 AM 18 Views
then - 23/01/2003 11:36:44 AM 15 Views
Once again... - 23/01/2003 11:46:21 AM 13 Views
I disagree. - 23/01/2003 11:39:45 AM 17 Views
*sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:49:46 AM 18 Views
Re: *sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:52:53 AM 14 Views
Gladly... - 23/01/2003 12:15:52 PM 15 Views
sigh *NM* - 23/01/2003 12:02:01 PM 4 Views
This is wrong in so many ways - 23/01/2003 12:22:12 PM 17 Views
Geeze, people - 23/01/2003 02:35:32 PM 22 Views
As long as we're clear - 23/01/2003 02:57:17 PM 19 Views
We're clear - 24/01/2003 11:54:47 AM 6 Views
Urm... - 23/01/2003 03:02:16 PM 18 Views
Re: Urm... - 24/01/2003 01:25:24 PM 10 Views
true 'nuff. - 24/01/2003 01:51:12 PM 8 Views
Come on... - 24/01/2003 02:29:10 PM 7 Views
excellent, i am pleased he withdrew. *NM* - 23/01/2003 03:55:22 PM 2 Views
Things like this anger me.. - 26/01/2003 07:03:21 AM 8 Views
I think he knows - 26/01/2003 10:28:38 AM 6 Views