Active Users:97 Time:22/05/2019 11:36:21 PM
Helping me understand Diademed_Battle_Lord - 24/01/2003 04:08:46 PM

Iraq is a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
Does the US, UK, China, or France ever get inspected for these weapons of mass destruction? (I'm sorry, this treaty only covers NUKES) I would hope that if another country acted like America has the last 50 years, there would be some of us resisting that country having it's military on our land, in our homes, and taking over the Earth...


The ABM treaty has a clause allowing either signatory to give 6 months notice and withdraw. So we did.
Thank you sooo much for stating the obvious...

As far as "Prisoners of War" in Cuba, we disagree that anything we have done is a violation of (I presume you mean) the Geneva Convention.

Who is WE? If you are talking about the US, obviously they disagree!! And obviously they took prisoners of war!!! They went to another country and fought the natives and took PRISONERS!!!

The Baruch plan of 1946, offered by the United States, sought to forestall nuclear arms proliferation by placing all nuclear resources under international ownership and control.

But the early postwar efforts to achieve agreement on nuclear disarmament failed. The Soviet Union in 1949, the United Kingdom in 1952, France in 1960, and the Peoples Republic of China in 1964, became nuclear-weapon states.

So the US thought it would be the only one with Nukes...interesting...I wonder what would have happened if Iraq had been one these countries that are now ALLOWED to have these weapons?

OILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILWARWARWARWARWARWARWAR




~4,000,000 BC--Human race begins
~1800 AD--Population hits 1 billion.
~2000 AD........WOW
Any Questions?
Apathy is beautiful.
Help Control The Human Population, Have your Fetus Pithed.





View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Condoleeza Rice on Compliance 101..... - 23/01/2003 01:03:21 PM 205 Views
Was hoping someone would post this article... - 23/01/2003 01:18:03 PM 38 Views
I expect the silence to be deafening.... - 23/01/2003 02:03:46 PM 25 Views
i'd vote for her instead of a LOT of others who might run *NM* - 23/01/2003 03:51:14 PM 3 Views
Alright then, question... - 23/01/2003 03:40:22 PM 27 Views
Well... - 23/01/2003 03:45:59 PM 22 Views
I never knew your name was Earnest! - 23/01/2003 03:57:59 PM 20 Views
Ah, I see. - 23/01/2003 05:36:47 PM 12 Views
There are many differences between the USA and Iraq - 23/01/2003 04:11:14 PM 17 Views
Re: Alright then, question... - 23/01/2003 05:04:13 PM 16 Views
a spectacular example of why.... - 23/01/2003 03:53:54 PM 19 Views
a couple quick little points - 23/01/2003 04:25:34 PM 28 Views
*taps wadsies patella tendon....watches leg jump* - 23/01/2003 04:33:09 PM 24 Views
actually........ - 23/01/2003 04:54:39 PM 20 Views
Re: actually........ - 23/01/2003 06:08:51 PM 18 Views
ooooooh - 23/01/2003 09:08:29 PM 18 Views
Thank you - 23/01/2003 09:32:03 PM 16 Views
Oil - 24/01/2003 04:00:46 AM 18 Views
Short answer Iraq, long answer same but I use more words *NM* - 24/01/2003 07:47:18 AM 5 Views
All nations with a lot to gain by doing it - 24/01/2003 07:55:14 AM 10 Views
Iraq hasn't been ostracized like South Africa? *NM* - 24/01/2003 11:28:37 AM 4 Views
Not for as long or as heavily, also SA had a ruling class with - 24/01/2003 12:08:57 PM 7 Views
agreed...but still analogous. Iraq wants sanctions lifted *NM* - 24/01/2003 12:16:28 PM 3 Views
Ignore, double post, I hate computers they're the tool of satan - 24/01/2003 07:55:14 AM 9 Views
Understanding Something... - 24/01/2003 10:40:56 AM 18 Views
Helping you understand - 24/01/2003 10:50:20 AM 22 Views
Re: POW - 24/01/2003 12:54:28 PM 17 Views
No problem - 24/01/2003 01:00:08 PM 18 Views
Helping me understand - 24/01/2003 04:08:46 PM 15 Views
Indeed - 24/01/2003 04:26:33 PM 16 Views
Re: Indeed - 29/01/2003 03:22:43 PM 11 Views
Re: Indeed - 29/01/2003 04:05:05 PM 13 Views
Rule breaking - 30/01/2003 04:53:26 AM 8 Views
Re: Rule breaking - 30/01/2003 06:59:12 AM 14 Views
To be honest - 30/01/2003 07:31:20 AM 6 Views
I took him to mean - 30/01/2003 07:36:45 AM 9 Views
Re: I took him to mean - 30/01/2003 08:08:35 AM 6 Views
Conversing - 30/01/2003 09:04:31 AM 10 Views