Active Users:414 Time:08/04/2026 10:09:40 PM
I'm pretty sure that I found MbotF from Wotmania, so thanks for that. GateKeeper Send a noteboard - 17/05/2010 03:28:08 PM
I'm really glad you stuck it out Larry. Alot of the people that I try to introduce this series to have a hard time moving past Gardens. A couple are even heavy fantasy readers, but such is my dedication that I've now simplified my pitch to new people I want to experience this great series. Gardens of the Moon is like loosing your virginity. You don't know what's going on at first, some parts hurt, some parts make you feel good, others leave you dazed and confused. But to suffer is to know the *ahem* climax at the end, leaving you wanting more. The second book, is when I truely fell in love with Erikson, and I feel that if most people make it to that book, there will never be a doubt again. For me Deadhouse was my true love, but most people think Memories of Ice to be the best. Well, Deadhouse broke my heart like nothing else, and Memories, while great, just didn't make me get goosebumps like so many moments in Deadhouse Gates. I'll comment on your later posts as well.

GATE

PS. Thanks for keeping the board alive!
Reply to message
Steven Erikson and Ian Cameron Esslemont, Malazan Book of the Fallen (series reviews) - 17/05/2010 01:09:47 PM 1513 Views
Gardens of the Moon (2002-2005 re-reads; 2010 re-read) - 17/05/2010 01:10:14 PM 1129 Views
I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 17/05/2010 01:32:28 PM 984 Views
Legolas - 17/05/2010 07:17:38 PM 965 Views
I wonder as well - 18/05/2010 07:12:23 PM 991 Views
Re: I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 19/05/2010 02:12:42 PM 882 Views
MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 12:29:22 PM 823 Views
Re: MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 03:39:10 PM 935 Views
Agreed. - 21/05/2010 03:43:56 PM 943 Views
That’s one of the things I like about MT more than DG - 22/05/2010 11:57:32 AM 852 Views
Larry - 17/05/2010 07:19:16 PM 947 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 18/05/2010 07:12:46 PM 384 Views
For me, GotM remains a half-failure - 22/05/2010 06:05:30 PM 1139 Views
I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 22/05/2010 07:32:25 PM 943 Views
Re: I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 23/05/2010 10:32:49 PM 1052 Views
Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 04:20:35 PM 899 Views
Re: Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 10:57:00 PM 996 Views
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM 1008 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 02:11:01 PM 929 Views
I'm waiting for the paperback. - 28/05/2010 08:44:47 PM 891 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 10:51:10 PM 1039 Views
I'm pretty sure that I found MbotF from Wotmania, so thanks for that. - 17/05/2010 03:28:08 PM 950 Views
It's not my cup of tea. Good luck reading it! - 19/05/2010 03:42:08 PM 1098 Views
I've got to ask. - 20/05/2010 08:56:14 PM 914 Views
Fans of the series told me that "Gardens of the Moon" isn't a good book to start with. - 21/05/2010 10:47:52 PM 1050 Views
I agree with Kotagg - 21/05/2010 01:52:06 PM 890 Views
I thought it was very standard fare. - 21/05/2010 10:49:41 PM 1047 Views
Deadhouse Gates (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 21/05/2010 06:13:47 PM 990 Views
You left out the most important part! - 21/05/2010 06:45:58 PM 1043 Views
Some things I leave until latter novels - 21/05/2010 06:54:36 PM 1026 Views
I find myself... - 06/06/2010 03:21:07 AM 1074 Views
From what I recall, yes - 06/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 921 Views
It makes sense. Thanks - 14/06/2010 11:57:08 PM 1080 Views
Memories of Ice (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 27/05/2010 08:47:02 AM 1003 Views
As I posted in your blog RE: Themes. - 27/05/2010 05:25:19 PM 1032 Views
House of Chains (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 01/06/2010 06:17:01 AM 1045 Views

Reply to Message