They can be now because of a change in set up of the House of Lords in 1999 or so. So 92 members of the Lords are hereditary, and the others can then be in the House of Commons, if they are duly elected.
Makes sense - kind of like how the former king of Bulgaria managed to get himself elected PM sixty years down the line (only less spectacular, I suppose

See link - the Marquess of Hartington, future Duke of Devonshire, was Secretary for War at that point, but held his seat in the Commons until he became Duke. And Lord Randolph Churchill (Winston's father) is just styled "Lord" as you can see - according to Wikipedia, he was the third son of the Duke of Marlborough, hence never got a peerage or seat in the Lords, not even a courtesy title, but he still got to call himself Lord.
This message last edited by Legolas on 02/06/2010 at 11:46:56 PM
/Other Literature: Drood by Dan Simmons
02/06/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 6174 Views
I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
02/06/2010 11:15:33 PM
- 2022 Views
Re: I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
02/06/2010 11:18:23 PM
- 2090 Views
There are (okay, were, I'm temporarily living in the 1890s...) MPs who are styled Lord, though.
02/06/2010 11:22:33 PM
- 1879 Views
Link me, please?
02/06/2010 11:31:01 PM
- 1867 Views
Sure.
02/06/2010 11:46:32 PM
- 2268 Views
Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
02/06/2010 11:18:56 PM
- 1851 Views

Re: Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
06/06/2010 01:43:42 AM
- 1894 Views

That Italian book
06/06/2010 09:24:47 AM
- 1713 Views
damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
03/06/2010 05:29:42 PM
- 1855 Views
Re: damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
03/06/2010 05:36:06 PM
- 1895 Views
Have now finished it.
04/06/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 1822 Views
*spoiler*
04/06/2010 04:32:19 PM
- 1935 Views
Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
04/06/2010 04:43:34 PM
- 1840 Views
Re: Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
04/06/2010 04:56:35 PM
- 1820 Views