Active Users:1631 Time:16/12/2025 03:38:12 AM
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM
I think.

Even though that is a silly thought, probably - some unimportant character can easily be named several dozen times in a few paragraphs and so get to more mentions than, apparently, the rather important Cirdan. I'm guessing the Appendices have been left out of this.


only show up in the Appendices. Gildor, for instance, and Cirdan, do not actually take up much space in the main text/s. Helm Hammerhand isn't there at all, just mentioned because of a geographical-historical-strategic coincidence. He's not an important character in the text's present. He's very important backstory, and history.

Tolkien beat us around the head with several things, but every so often he'd do it just one per item, but with great precision and force, so it stays with us even though it wasn't repeated.

It's not all that surprising, is all.

I'll tell you the one I find shocking? Goldberry. Really? She wasn't mentioned all that much... was she?
http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
Reply to message
Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle - 25/06/2010 04:09:13 PM 1389 Views
38 - getting them all or close to all would be impressive indeed. - 25/06/2010 05:30:33 PM 876 Views
37. I am so upset I couldn't remember Glorfindel's name. - 25/06/2010 06:02:33 PM 892 Views
Re: 37. I am so upset I couldn't remember Glorfindel's name. - 25/06/2010 06:35:36 PM 845 Views
Heh - 25/06/2010 11:02:56 PM 965 Views
I also couldn't remember his name. - 29/06/2010 09:33:56 PM 1016 Views
46. - But that was trial and error - 25/06/2010 06:35:02 PM 856 Views
I know! So weird. - 25/06/2010 10:19:07 PM 896 Views
Re: I know! So weird. - 25/06/2010 10:22:55 PM 912 Views
Re: Basically I think we are judging by importance of role/status. The game judges by number. - 25/06/2010 11:45:42 PM 864 Views
I realize, but you'd think the two would coincide more. - 26/06/2010 12:19:05 AM 876 Views
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory - 26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM 986 Views
Apparently, yeah. - 26/06/2010 12:42:29 AM 888 Views
Re: He is this elf - 26/06/2010 12:49:22 AM 1033 Views
It just registers every time the word is said. Tom Bombadil couldn't stop talking about the bitch. - 26/06/2010 01:17:42 AM 871 Views
Re: You're so jealous! *NM* - 26/06/2010 04:33:23 PM 490 Views
I know. *NM* - 26/06/2010 08:51:17 PM 427 Views
35. Not too shabby. - 25/06/2010 11:00:09 PM 821 Views
40, but I'll admit that I took it last night too. - 25/06/2010 11:15:04 PM 917 Views
Re: 45. (naming a few names) - 25/06/2010 11:44:02 PM 974 Views
I had my fair share of names I didn't know, too, but I can help with those... - 26/06/2010 12:39:09 AM 843 Views
Re: I'm going through my books now, actually. - 26/06/2010 12:49:53 AM 1008 Views
I only got 39. - 26/06/2010 01:13:24 AM 873 Views
You people are nerds. - 26/06/2010 01:15:15 AM 966 Views
Stop trying to make yourself feel better. - 26/06/2010 03:13:32 AM 908 Views
35 as well, and I'm retarded/haven't thought about LotR in way too long.... - 26/06/2010 01:18:51 AM 962 Views
29. I'm awesome. Virtually everyone I remembered was from the movies. - 26/06/2010 06:59:41 AM 883 Views
I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 09:46:38 AM 946 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 10:51:33 AM 880 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 10:54:59 AM 913 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 10:56:43 AM 834 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 10:57:59 AM 913 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. - 26/06/2010 11:03:14 AM 1038 Views
Re: Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle - 26/06/2010 08:15:59 AM 930 Views
29, pretty much the first column and only a few more. - 28/06/2010 10:57:09 AM 852 Views
35 of out 50 - 29/06/2010 03:08:00 AM 956 Views
38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series - 29/06/2010 02:14:31 PM 886 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series - 29/06/2010 03:31:19 PM 904 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series - 29/06/2010 09:37:56 PM 958 Views
4 - 29/06/2010 07:14:07 PM 875 Views
37 'sif Shadowfax counts as a character *NM* - 05/07/2010 07:58:40 AM 525 Views

Reply to Message