Active Users:319 Time:02/05/2024 11:30:34 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM
I think she has old-age selective memory.

I must have formed the impression of what it was about from one of you. Unless Legolas is the culprit. There are a limited number of people who have been telling me to read it.

I'm more likely to have told you it was about who owns literary works after their author is dead, and if the public gets to own the works then does that mean we get to own the author's lives as well? And about literary criticism, etc. Against the backdrop of relationships.

I'm pretty sure I've never mentioned Roland & Maud's relationship because I don't like it. :P


No, it does feel a little ... off. Then again, everyone in this book is dysfunctional. That is another thing I have come to expect from Byatt. The only normal person in this book is Lady Bailey.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Other Liteature: Possession by A.S. Byatt Camilla - 06/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 5128 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. Danae al'Thor - 06/07/2010 06:43:34 PM 1554 Views
I'm sure I did too. Rebekah - 06/07/2010 07:00:06 PM 1443 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla - 07/07/2010 12:05:16 AM 1410 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Rebekah - 07/07/2010 08:32:29 AM 1385 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM 1457 Views
Hm. Rebekah - 10/07/2010 12:55:20 AM 1369 Views
The main reason for my love of the book are the letters, I would say. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:00:13 PM 1383 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. Camilla - 07/07/2010 12:04:03 AM 1485 Views
Re: No no. I talked about Danae al'Thor - 07/07/2010 12:49:30 AM 1362 Views
Re: No no. I talked about Camilla - 07/07/2010 09:01:28 AM 1618 Views
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Tim - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM 1390 Views
Re: Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Camilla - 09/07/2010 11:45:45 AM 1387 Views
It's funny. I'd have to reread, but based on what I remember I have the opposite view. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:06:57 PM 1368 Views
Coincidentally, it was also a digested read in the Guardian. Camilla - 09/07/2010 03:48:09 PM 1594 Views
Meh.... Milla - 09/07/2010 07:54:12 PM 1541 Views
Awww. Rebekah - 10/07/2010 12:54:44 AM 1387 Views
Re: Awww. Milla - 10/07/2010 07:14:37 PM 1579 Views
Re: Meh.... Camilla - 10/07/2010 11:24:43 AM 1377 Views
Re: Meh.... Milla - 10/07/2010 07:15:29 PM 1492 Views
It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:42:39 PM 1486 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Camilla - 25/07/2010 09:09:50 AM 1373 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Legolas - 25/07/2010 10:32:55 AM 1374 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes