Active Users:330 Time:02/05/2024 12:15:18 PM
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Tim Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM
The "factory" metaphor was particularly damning. I think the parallel love-stories were meant to be the sugar-coating around the bitter pill in the centre. Though the C19 love-story was much more enjoyable to read than the C20 one, which just seemed contrived.

I like how the morbidity of the academics' pursuit slowly grows until it reaches the end-point of grave-robbery. (Whited out as this may be seen as a spoiler). Your point about spiritualism is also apt.

I think "infamous" is the right word for the poems. Christabel LaMotte's were bloody awful (IMO). I quite liked Ash's though. Is that a symptom of being male? :P

About interpretation: I don't think the poems are meant to be there as poems, for you to interpret as you wish in their own right. They're devices, ersatz poems, contrived for the sake of the novel they're in. They are the way they are (trite, pretentious, or whatever) because their being that way serves the purposes of the novel. Such flaws as they have are deliberate. I can see why this is frustrating for a poetry lover – they're like a cardboard cut-out of a sex symbol instead of the real thing – but you've got to hand it to Byatt that writing poetry that's bad in exactly the way you want it to be shows incredible skill. It's like a virtuoso trying to sing off-key on purpose – so much more difficult than doing it well.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
/Other Liteature: Possession by A.S. Byatt - 06/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 5128 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. - 06/07/2010 06:43:34 PM 1554 Views
I'm sure I did too. - 06/07/2010 07:00:06 PM 1443 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 12:05:16 AM 1410 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 08:32:29 AM 1385 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM 1457 Views
Hm. - 10/07/2010 12:55:20 AM 1369 Views
The main reason for my love of the book are the letters, I would say. - 24/07/2010 10:00:13 PM 1383 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. - 07/07/2010 12:04:03 AM 1485 Views
Re: No no. I talked about - 07/07/2010 12:49:30 AM 1362 Views
Re: No no. I talked about - 07/07/2010 09:01:28 AM 1618 Views
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM 1391 Views
Coincidentally, it was also a digested read in the Guardian. - 09/07/2010 03:48:09 PM 1595 Views
Meh.... - 09/07/2010 07:54:12 PM 1541 Views
Awww. - 10/07/2010 12:54:44 AM 1387 Views
Re: Awww. - 10/07/2010 07:14:37 PM 1579 Views
Re: Meh.... - 10/07/2010 11:24:43 AM 1377 Views
Re: Meh.... - 10/07/2010 07:15:29 PM 1492 Views

Reply to Message