Active Users:789 Time:27/06/2026 03:38:16 PM
In literary criticism that is distressingly common. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 10/09/2010 07:16:40 AM
Possibly because if they were to write it in halfway decent English, more people would realize the actual value of an advanced degree in literary criticism.

That academia has managed to equate itself so strongly with intellect and utility is one of the biggest ongoing scams of our time.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Someone explain this academic article snippet to me? - 10/09/2010 01:28:05 AM 622 Views
First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 05:40:22 AM 516 Views
Actually that helps a bundle. - 10/09/2010 06:05:52 AM 527 Views
Re: First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 09:12:41 AM 500 Views
I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:26:13 AM 518 Views
Re: I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:29:35 AM 564 Views
In literary criticism that is distressingly common. - 10/09/2010 07:16:40 AM 514 Views
Derridean critique of presence - 10/09/2010 09:43:51 AM 519 Views
I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:08:42 AM 434 Views
Re: I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:10:26 AM 500 Views
I realize that - 10/09/2010 11:18:07 AM 469 Views
Re: I realize that - 10/09/2010 01:22:49 PM 467 Views

Reply to Message