Active Users:672 Time:30/05/2026 05:46:30 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yeah, I can't actually remember which version I read... Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/09/2010 03:03:00 PM
Implicitly, though ;)

Well, yeah. But hardly anything that controversial.
Reply to message
A follow-up to my earlier post about sexuality in YA, more specifically in His Dark Materials Legolas - 14/09/2010 11:13:45 AM 1041 Views
Now I wonder which version I have at home ironclad - 14/09/2010 02:27:24 PM 749 Views
Yeah, I can't actually remember which version I read... Legolas - 14/09/2010 03:03:00 PM 668 Views
Random house, New York. So it's probably missing. *NM* ironclad - 14/09/2010 09:19:41 PM 322 Views
Umm Prickly - 14/09/2010 02:54:55 PM 727 Views
It isn't equivalent to sex, no, but it is said to be the implicit cause of it. *NM* Ghavrel - 14/09/2010 09:54:00 PM 275 Views
Your title line is hilarious. Gold Star for Legolas! *NM* callandor1000 - 14/09/2010 03:00:49 PM 356 Views
Thank you, I'll be here all week. *NM* Legolas - 14/09/2010 03:02:12 PM 274 Views
Shit. Then who will be here next week? I need entertainment then, too. *NM* callandor1000 - 15/09/2010 04:06:40 AM 346 Views
america sucks. i hate that they changed the book. temeraire - 14/09/2010 04:46:56 PM 716 Views
My mind just read your post in the voice of a robot. *NM* lord-of-shadow - 14/09/2010 10:54:58 PM 283 Views
Not explicitly sexual? But it said "breast"! We must protect our children from this filth! Tim - 15/09/2010 04:22:58 PM 670 Views
Could have just changed it to chest. It wasn't a sexualized "breast" in that context. *NM* Vivien - 21/09/2010 04:03:00 PM 276 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes