If quality writing is separate from the tense that is used, then the Booker should choose based on quality writing and not care about the tense whatsoever. If these authors had an issue with the actual quality of the selections, then okay, but having an issue with the fact that some of them are in present tense is ... silly.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This just in: Philip Pullman dislikes The Present Tense.
- 14/09/2010 05:01:17 PM
1306 Views
Phillip Pullman is a silly man
- 14/09/2010 05:05:50 PM
796 Views
Re: Phillip Hensher's longer opinion piece is less emotional but still weird.
- 14/09/2010 05:17:40 PM
858 Views
I dunno, I kind of see his point.
- 14/09/2010 06:20:50 PM
768 Views
Re: I mainly find myself concerned because of the "make a stand" part.
- 14/09/2010 06:23:13 PM
786 Views
Censorship? He's hardly asking them to throw those novels out or not to select them anymore.
- 14/09/2010 06:33:14 PM
773 Views
That's silly.
- 15/09/2010 12:30:02 AM
776 Views
Well, it's like if a poetry board only picked poems written in lowercase
- 18/09/2010 08:21:36 AM
738 Views
I was amused to see that the article was written in past tense. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 06:47:31 AM
516 Views
So do I
- 22/09/2010 05:38:09 AM
772 Views
Re: So do I
- 22/09/2010 09:16:45 AM
657 Views
And on vellum. And by hand. And typically with long, boring ekphrases.
- 22/09/2010 10:03:46 AM
712 Views