Also, what people claim are "shelves full of Bibles" are typically shelves full of Bibles and Biblical commentary, which as you know is fairly extensive (and exhaustive). 
But still, various translations alone bring up the number considerably. You have the King James, of course, and the New King James, and the American Standard, and the New American Standard, and the New American Standard Revised (je t'adore), and the New International Version (je te deteste), and the Living Word Translation (words do not describe), and that's just off of the top of my head. There are countless modernizations, each more unfortunate than the next.
LET'S HAVE AN EXAMPLE, SHALL WE? Here's a passage from the New American Standard Bible (John 1:9-14):
And from... "The Message." Ugh.
Point being... there is a lot of variation.
But still, various translations alone bring up the number considerably. You have the King James, of course, and the New King James, and the American Standard, and the New American Standard, and the New American Standard Revised (je t'adore), and the New International Version (je te deteste), and the Living Word Translation (words do not describe), and that's just off of the top of my head. There are countless modernizations, each more unfortunate than the next.
LET'S HAVE AN EXAMPLE, SHALL WE? Here's a passage from the New American Standard Bible (John 1:9-14):
There was the true Light which, coming into the world, enlightens every man.
He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.
He came to His own, and those who were His own did not receive Him.
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become (children of God, even to those who believe in His name,
who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.
He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.
He came to His own, and those who were His own did not receive Him.
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become (children of God, even to those who believe in His name,
who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.
And from... "The Message." Ugh.
The Life-Light was the real thing:
Every person entering Life
he brings into Light.
He was in the world,
the world was there through him,
and yet the world didn't even notice.
He came to his own people,
but they didn't want him.
But whoever did want him,
who believed he was who he claimed
and would do what he said,
He made to be their true selves,
their child-of-God selves.
These are the God-begotten,
not blood-begotten,
not flesh-begotten,
not sex-begotten.
The Word became flesh and blood,
and moved into the neighborhood.
We saw the glory with our own eyes,
the one-of-a-kind glory,
like Father, like Son,
Generous inside and out,
true from start to finish.
Every person entering Life
he brings into Light.
He was in the world,
the world was there through him,
and yet the world didn't even notice.
He came to his own people,
but they didn't want him.
But whoever did want him,
who believed he was who he claimed
and would do what he said,
He made to be their true selves,
their child-of-God selves.
These are the God-begotten,
not blood-begotten,
not flesh-begotten,
not sex-begotten.
The Word became flesh and blood,
and moved into the neighborhood.
We saw the glory with our own eyes,
the one-of-a-kind glory,
like Father, like Son,
Generous inside and out,
true from start to finish.
Point being... there is a lot of variation.
Poetry:
- 08/11/2010 02:07:39 AM
1481 Views
Re: Poetry:
- 08/11/2010 04:13:38 AM
1024 Views
This is why people dislike you.
- 09/11/2010 07:03:17 PM
1015 Views
Umm...I care?
- 09/11/2010 08:42:55 PM
990 Views
Because you should care about being intelligent, rather than appearing to be intelligent.
- 09/11/2010 10:32:04 PM
1027 Views
Again, why would I care?
- 09/11/2010 10:38:21 PM
1042 Views
No one can make you care about being decent, or intelligent, or a viable member of the community.
- 09/11/2010 10:41:34 PM
951 Views
I think it's rather pointless, to be honest.
- 09/11/2010 10:54:17 PM
980 Views
Then why are you even here?
- 09/11/2010 10:59:49 PM
931 Views
I don't know. I thought I'd see how long I could string you along.
- 09/11/2010 11:00:37 PM
857 Views
You're the one who doesn't care.
- 09/11/2010 11:02:11 PM
905 Views
I care only as much as I care. What others think is irrelevant to that.
- 09/11/2010 11:04:15 PM
904 Views
But you're still responding to me.
- 09/11/2010 11:05:37 PM
973 Views
Because I'm stringing you out until you quit.
- 09/11/2010 11:10:18 PM
1017 Views
I'm not going to. I find this entertaining.
- 09/11/2010 11:12:27 PM
962 Views
I do as well. It's fun pretending to be an asshole, I'll admit.
- 09/11/2010 11:17:34 PM
930 Views
Come now, who's pretending?
- 09/11/2010 11:22:18 PM
961 Views
That is officially the last one before I start editing and making them NM. *NM*
- 09/11/2010 11:24:12 PM
440 Views
*NM*
- 09/11/2010 11:24:12 PM
440 Views
Me, most of the time
- 09/11/2010 11:40:26 PM
946 Views
Keep telling yourself that. *NM*
- 09/11/2010 11:46:34 PM
820 Views
Why would I? It's not something I think much about these days. Again, what others think is trivial. *NM*
- 10/11/2010 12:01:03 AM
473 Views
Are you 5?
- 09/11/2010 11:14:26 PM
818 Views
Nah
- 09/11/2010 11:15:48 PM
1075 Views
But you were asked about it originally. That was my point.
- 09/11/2010 11:23:25 PM
866 Views
And I was evasive about it at the time. When pressed, I answered more fully.
- 09/11/2010 11:48:27 PM
952 Views
Why be evasive?
- 10/11/2010 12:16:19 AM
1049 Views
Because I didn't want to spend an hour pulling out a few dozen books.
- 10/11/2010 12:19:55 AM
1067 Views
Ye gods. Could you people at the very, very least make your messages NM?
- 09/11/2010 11:17:25 PM
923 Views
*NM*
I must say, I'm glad you all decided to play up when I was having an evening off. 
*NM*
- 10/11/2010 12:08:59 PM
427 Views
*NM*
- 10/11/2010 12:08:59 PM
427 Views
I disagree with your claim that there can be no value in translations.
- 09/11/2010 08:51:20 PM
931 Views
Not "no value", but "different value" is what I would argue
- 09/11/2010 09:55:54 PM
1012 Views
I don't disagree, but you can't possibly learn all languages, yet you can read translations of all.
- 09/11/2010 10:56:58 PM
1012 Views
My choice, hands down, is to ignore the poetry in languages I don't read.
- 10/11/2010 01:44:32 AM
946 Views
An English translation of The Divine Comedy was pivotal to my conversion to Christianity.
- 10/11/2010 11:04:57 AM
866 Views
Ooh, good survey. I've been thinking for a while we needed more poetry discussion.
- 08/11/2010 10:58:24 AM
1089 Views
I think you underestimate the number of translations of the Bible.
- 09/11/2010 01:20:30 AM
1083 Views
Did they just translate logos as... life-light?
- 09/11/2010 07:14:28 PM
960 Views
Yes. Yes, they did. *NM*
- 09/11/2010 09:56:09 PM
368 Views
I think poetry is largely overrated.
- 08/11/2010 06:12:59 PM
1070 Views
the problem is most good poets are dead and dead people tend to fail at marketing
- 08/11/2010 06:44:18 PM
1007 Views
I like some poetry, but by no means all.
- 09/11/2010 12:28:41 AM
1098 Views
Now that you mention it, The Imperfect Enjoyment might rank among my favourite poems. *NM*
- 09/11/2010 12:46:56 AM
390 Views
*NM*
- 09/11/2010 12:46:56 AM
390 Views
It is excellent
- 09/11/2010 08:16:01 PM
1109 Views
*NM*
Re: Poetry:
- 10/11/2010 04:57:31 PM
919 Views
Re: Nice
- 11/11/2010 01:39:48 AM
1068 Views
Man. . . That voice? Yeah. He should be reading me stories every night.
- 11/11/2010 11:57:02 AM
1142 Views
Re: Man. . . That voice? Yeah. He should be reading me stories every night.
- 12/11/2010 04:36:22 AM
1895 Views