Active Users:1393 Time:24/08/2025 08:12:12 PM
That looks like pretty standard fare stuff. No offense intended. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/01/2011 06:51:09 AM
I'm trying to nail down a sort of back to basics reading list for myself. I've read about half of those and know next to nothing of the others.

I plan to revisit Godot. Beckett is brilliant.

Why do you have Conrad on there? He's quite possibly the most overrated author that i have come across in the history of the English language. Wretched, stilted writing.

I'd go with the Chaucer, the Boccacio, and the Beckett.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
So you're given a list of books from which to choose those you want to know more about... - 30/01/2011 04:13:47 AM 1243 Views
That looks like pretty standard fare stuff. No offense intended. - 30/01/2011 06:51:09 AM 973 Views
I'm mostly revisiting books I read in my late teens to mid-20s - 30/01/2011 07:42:48 AM 993 Views
The themes may improve. His inability to form any sort of coherent style likely will remain. - 30/01/2011 08:55:10 PM 901 Views
I disagree. Quite strongly, actually. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:10:34 PM 464 Views
Well, you're entitled to be wrong. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 436 Views
These ones: - 30/01/2011 01:07:58 PM 1002 Views
Don't choose Gurney! - 30/01/2011 02:23:14 PM 1006 Views
I'm just intrigued by someone writing about the Hittites. *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:15:00 PM 428 Views
There is a much better book on the Hittites, though. - 31/01/2011 02:11:03 AM 861 Views
I think Camilla ought to read Flight to Lucifer - 30/01/2011 04:42:32 PM 944 Views
I am doing very well pretending Bloom does not exist - 30/01/2011 06:54:24 PM 833 Views
You might like his novel, though - 30/01/2011 07:03:09 PM 827 Views
Re: You might like his novel, though - 30/01/2011 07:12:30 PM 957 Views
Not too badly - 30/01/2011 07:21:03 PM 834 Views
S'why I chose it. *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:15:29 PM 492 Views
Ha! *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:20:23 PM 473 Views
Okay. - 30/01/2011 01:13:24 PM 895 Views
The number of votes for Chaucer is curious - 30/01/2011 04:41:37 PM 974 Views
I find Chaucer less interesting than Boccaccio *NM* - 30/01/2011 06:50:44 PM 475 Views
I'm divided on the two - 30/01/2011 07:02:32 PM 846 Views
Well... could be an international readership? - 30/01/2011 07:38:51 PM 936 Views
Very possible, considering 1/3 or so of the blog's readership isn't Anglo-American *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:11:26 PM 450 Views
Re: Very possible, considering 1/3 or so of the blog's readership isn't Anglo-American - 30/01/2011 11:04:11 PM 847 Views
There is that as well - 02/02/2011 03:52:40 AM 982 Views
Re: There is that as well - 02/02/2011 11:57:26 AM 1108 Views
Very true. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:12:46 PM 464 Views
Hm. - 30/01/2011 09:35:18 PM 1278 Views
Heathen! - 02/02/2011 03:55:46 AM 1076 Views
Beckett, Boccaccio, Calvino. *NM* - 30/01/2011 10:29:38 PM 591 Views
Hmm ... - 31/01/2011 12:20:37 AM 1249 Views

Reply to Message