Active Users:207 Time:02/06/2024 05:53:59 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I disagree Stephen Send a noteboard - 16/02/2011 01:05:19 AM
Foreshadowing is not a necessity. Pure suprise is interesting.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Reply to message
I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release. Rebekah - 14/02/2011 05:34:38 PM 876 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release. Macharius - 14/02/2011 05:49:06 PM 598 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release. Rebekah - 14/02/2011 05:59:20 PM 566 Views
Rowling has talked about having problems with book 1, but Deadsy - 14/02/2011 06:56:10 PM 939 Views
she could make changes and release special editions. Fans love that. Japhy - 15/02/2011 01:44:16 AM 552 Views
Except that the later books generally compensate for it... lord-of-shadow - 15/02/2011 01:54:58 AM 610 Views
There were surprises in later books that should have at least been hinted at earlier. *NM* Japhy - 15/02/2011 10:49:49 PM 231 Views
I disagree Stephen - 16/02/2011 01:05:19 AM 460 Views
I just read Brideshead Revisited Camilla - 14/02/2011 07:32:25 PM 524 Views
Yeah, that was rather remarkable, his foreword there. *NM* Legolas - 15/02/2011 07:36:06 PM 201 Views
Didn't Stephen King do a revised version of The Gunslinger? *NM* Dark Knight - 15/02/2011 11:29:42 PM 197 Views
I have it. It is terrible. Ghavrel - 16/02/2011 03:43:16 AM 547 Views
Much of the older King work is better than his newer stuff. Same with George Lucas. Arok Manok - 04/03/2011 04:04:17 AM 480 Views
Re: I want JKR's thoughts on her last book. The first is much better. *NM* Danae al'Thor - 22/02/2011 04:58:21 AM 227 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes