There's no suspense if the bigger army wins. It's somewhat expected. The only way that you could build suspense regarding the bigger army is if you incorporated some factor that would make it seem like the bigger army had no chance - such as millions of sword-wielding knights against two aliens in flying saucers with laser guns.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM
1442 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:17:00 PM
1054 Views
Well, usually the bigger army are the invaders. Defence tends to have an edge
- 20/09/2009 04:38:45 PM
1091 Views
It's an essential plot device
- 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM
1085 Views
Yeah but...
- 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM
1063 Views
I don't quite agree
- 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
1014 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that...
- 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM
956 Views
Fail. 
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1147 Views
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1147 Views
Hrmm...guess Miéville failed to follow the script then *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:48:29 PM
398 Views
and a lot of others. But there's a rumour somewhere that it's not the size that matters... *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:53:41 PM
390 Views
It's still a valid point, even if one author doesn't "follow the script." *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:34:48 AM
451 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM
1192 Views
That, and...
- 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM
1067 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby!
- 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM
1007 Views
That is not even fantasy...
- 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM
981 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM
413 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM
418 Views
Doubleplusungood.
- 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM
994 Views
Oops, sorry. Probably a thoughtcrime to put a space in. Rebellious waste of... pixels? Space? *NM*
- 25/09/2009 04:26:14 PM
441 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM
431 Views
All books should have a point, IMO. Otherwise, what's the point in reading them.
- 25/09/2009 04:32:43 PM
1073 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM*
- 26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM
468 Views
No, it's not. ScyFy does not lay claim to anything and everything that takes place...
- 26/09/2009 07:05:59 AM
996 Views
It's a novel which heavily relies upon futuristic technology. How is it not Science Fiction? *NM*
- 28/09/2009 01:43:23 AM
413 Views
I read it years ago and I don't remember any futuristic technology except...
- 28/09/2009 04:16:21 AM
1062 Views
I would say that if a story uses that sort of thing, it has a science fiction element.
- 28/09/2009 05:20:39 AM
855 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win.
- 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM
1028 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM
433 Views
"You can take our lives, but you can never take our freedom!" "...wrong!" *NM*
- 21/09/2009 11:02:25 PM
373 Views