I read it years ago and I don't remember any futuristic technology except...
Joker Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 04:16:21 AM
... cameras everywhere and some sort of two way television in Winston's flat. They're not cruising around on hovercars or traveling to stars. It's really just an extension of things that already existed. It's like saying that any novel that has any kind of sophisticated technology is ScyFy. If so, I guess Tom Clancy has been writing ScyFy his entire career.
I see Atwood's definition of "Speculative Fiction" as being more apt.
I see Atwood's definition of "Speculative Fiction" as being more apt.
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM
1492 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:17:00 PM
1101 Views
Well, usually the bigger army are the invaders. Defence tends to have an edge
- 20/09/2009 04:38:45 PM
1134 Views
It's an essential plot device
- 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM
1136 Views
Yeah but...
- 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM
1110 Views
I don't quite agree
- 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
1064 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that...
- 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM
1015 Views
Fail. 
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1195 Views
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1195 Views
Hrmm...guess Miéville failed to follow the script then *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:48:29 PM
415 Views
and a lot of others. But there's a rumour somewhere that it's not the size that matters... *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:53:41 PM
411 Views
It's still a valid point, even if one author doesn't "follow the script." *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:34:48 AM
471 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM
1239 Views
That, and...
- 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM
1117 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby!
- 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM
1060 Views
That is not even fantasy...
- 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM
1036 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM
434 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM
438 Views
Doubleplusungood.
- 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM
1042 Views
Oops, sorry. Probably a thoughtcrime to put a space in. Rebellious waste of... pixels? Space? *NM*
- 25/09/2009 04:26:14 PM
460 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM
454 Views
All books should have a point, IMO. Otherwise, what's the point in reading them.
- 25/09/2009 04:32:43 PM
1112 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM*
- 26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM
486 Views
No, it's not. ScyFy does not lay claim to anything and everything that takes place...
- 26/09/2009 07:05:59 AM
1050 Views
It's a novel which heavily relies upon futuristic technology. How is it not Science Fiction? *NM*
- 28/09/2009 01:43:23 AM
433 Views
I read it years ago and I don't remember any futuristic technology except...
- 28/09/2009 04:16:21 AM
1108 Views
I would say that if a story uses that sort of thing, it has a science fiction element.
- 28/09/2009 05:20:39 AM
894 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win.
- 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM
1073 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM
452 Views
"You can take our lives, but you can never take our freedom!" "...wrong!" *NM*
- 21/09/2009 11:02:25 PM
393 Views