Active Users:989 Time:02/02/2026 09:47:54 PM
No, because by definition one cannot read pictures. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 02/06/2011 01:39:12 AM
I'd peruse it, though, and probably enjoy it.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Would you read this book? - 02/06/2011 01:32:11 AM 1505 Views
No, because by definition one cannot read pictures. - 02/06/2011 01:39:12 AM 1081 Views
Not sure that qualifies as by defention - 02/06/2011 03:29:47 AM 1053 Views
That depends entirely on your definition of reading *NM* - 02/06/2011 03:28:30 PM 439 Views
I hope you realize how tautological that was. *NM* - 02/06/2011 06:50:54 PM 424 Views
I merely made the tautology explicit. It was already there in your claim. - 02/06/2011 09:23:28 PM 1061 Views
How was it there in my claim? - 03/06/2011 01:41:47 AM 1061 Views
Re: How was it there in my claim? - 03/06/2011 08:03:23 AM 1127 Views
I wouldn't go out of my way to do so. - 02/06/2011 03:01:43 AM 981 Views
how often have you read a book that you haven't gone out of your way to do so? - 02/06/2011 02:59:37 PM 1049 Views
There are a lot of books lying around my house. - 02/06/2011 08:01:10 PM 1063 Views
maybe? *NM* - 02/06/2011 05:52:48 AM 439 Views
I suck with comics, it just doesn't work for me. *NM* - 02/06/2011 07:06:27 AM 460 Views
I think I would - 02/06/2011 02:32:44 PM 1091 Views
no *NM* - 02/06/2011 03:00:16 PM 493 Views
Maybe - 02/06/2011 03:28:09 PM 959 Views
No because I have no desire to know what the title is. *NM* - 02/06/2011 11:59:37 PM 430 Views
That was cool as hell. *NM* - 03/06/2011 06:46:37 PM 431 Views
Maybe - 04/06/2011 02:22:43 PM 1223 Views
It looks interesting - 06/06/2011 08:51:07 PM 1107 Views

Reply to Message