Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
That, I think, was what annoyed me most about the article: the author's tacit assumption that in pursuit of her "good parenting" others will deny their children the opportunity to meaningfully interact with these texts.
It's one thing to evaluate the needs of your own child; it's something quite different for the school board to do do. Despite what the author seems to be claiming (and was I the only one to find her writing distractingly vague?), the "literati" only tend to take issue with the latter act of impersonal, bureaucratic censorship.
It's one thing to evaluate the needs of your own child; it's something quite different for the school board to do do. Despite what the author seems to be claiming (and was I the only one to find her writing distractingly vague?), the "literati" only tend to take issue with the latter act of impersonal, bureaucratic censorship.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark".
- 05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM
2051 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me
- 05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM
1006 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response.
- 05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
1043 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine
- 05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM
824 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented
- 05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM
896 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture,
- 06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM
983 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
- 06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM
762 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
- 06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM
719 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason.
- 06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM
909 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think.
- 07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM
948 Views
One certainly has to choose the real literature to present, certainly.
- 07/06/2011 02:27:00 PM
969 Views
Very good post.
- 06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM
781 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so. 
*NM*
- 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
278 Views
*NM*
- 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
278 Views
I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as
- 07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM
1042 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly
- 07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM
717 Views
Heh.
- 08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM
1022 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad?
- 08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM
939 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
- 09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
877 Views
the classic problem of people who have no idea what they are talking about
- 09/06/2011 04:16:25 PM
828 Views
Are you really equating reading about trauma with trauma? They are not the same. *NM*
- 09/06/2011 07:10:34 PM
291 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound,
- 05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM
1074 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies
- 05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM
998 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here.
- 06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM
1000 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of
- 06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM
1030 Views
I don't completely agree with that.
- 06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
985 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything
- 06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM
975 Views
To think the content described is acceptable, when they ban "Huck Finn" for using 'nigger'. 
*NM*
- 05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
309 Views
*NM*
- 05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
309 Views
CNN: "On a website, a person named 'Macharius' used the 'N-word'".
- 06/06/2011 01:58:35 AM
762 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
- 06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM
792 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
- 06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM
926 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
- 06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
1055 Views
Depends on the subject matter.
- 07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM
804 Views
Basically? Yes.
- 07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM
1049 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want?
- 07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM
718 Views
Don't be an idiot.
- 09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM
901 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this
- 06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM
989 Views
Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
- 06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
872 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me.
- 06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM
926 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this
- 07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM
803 Views
Having now read one of the books mentioned, Cheryl Rainfield's Scars...
- 08/06/2011 02:18:23 AM
1027 Views