Active Users:615 Time:25/12/2025 05:47:31 PM
I don't completely agree with that. nossy Send a noteboard - 06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
To go back to an earlier example, if you see 50 movies about murders and explosions, you'll definitely become a bit inured. On the other hand, if you read 50 murder mysteries, each one with a different characters, with different motivations, different examples on the ramifications of murder, then you're much more likely to say, "Hm. Murder is bad."

I have seen enough gory movies to know that when I'm hiding behind the couch, someone is going to say "It's just a movie!?" Becoming desensitized to violence in movies is not the same thing as becoming desensitized to violence in real life. And as I said, I'm not simply looking at homicidal maniacs - think of all the gray area in between.

Thinking about things is NEVER a bad idea. No matter what your age.

Unless you don't know how to find the silver lining. I'm not made to only see the bad side, but I have met people in my life who were very out of touch with what and how "normal" people think. And a few of them were young. If a kid sees few positive things in his /her life, reading a book that distills those dark thoughts and feeds it back to them w/o offering a bright ending is not going to help them. It's not to say every book does that, but I think you are over-simplifying the situation to suggest that they all have a positive moral or that children will automatically know how to manufacture one for themselves.

As for "picking up an unpleasant book w/o warning," that's what reading the back of a book is for. Or... you know, they can just, stop reading. If they don't like what they're reading, they won't read it. If they do like what they're reading, they will read it.

Again, that's oversimplification. I mean, seriously -- I accidentally bought a book that was basically erotica because it was on sale and the blurb sounded interesting. The back of the book does nothing but give you a few plot points and hooks. It doesn't say "Your child probably shouldn't read this because there is a graphic passage somewhere around page 118 concerning the exchange of bodily fluids." And what teenager who gets to that passage isn't going to read it, whether they it's the kind of book they like or not?
This message last edited by nossy on 06/06/2011 at 07:27:21 PM
Reply to message
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark". - 05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM 2115 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me - 05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM 1098 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response. - 05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM 1097 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine - 05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM 878 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented - 05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM 945 Views
This is different. - 06/06/2011 01:56:56 AM 952 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture, - 06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM 1037 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all? - 06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM 815 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all? - 06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM 770 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason. - 06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM 971 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think. - 07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM 1001 Views
Very good post. - 06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM 853 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so. *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM 304 Views
I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as - 07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM 1097 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly - 07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM 763 Views
Heh. - 08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM 1072 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad? - 08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM 995 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids - 09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM 938 Views
The Diary of Anne Frank? Seriously? - 10/06/2011 08:13:47 PM 915 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound, - 05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM 1130 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies - 05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM 1090 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here. - 06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM 1069 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of - 06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM 1096 Views
I don't completely agree with that. - 06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM 1056 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything - 06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM 1028 Views
I don't think that is what this is. - 06/06/2011 10:41:06 PM 926 Views
I suppose I'm giving a lot of credit to the status of "reader" - 07/06/2011 03:08:48 AM 919 Views
Your response is about where I sit. - 06/06/2011 12:30:04 PM 929 Views
Nope, this is stupid - 05/06/2011 06:38:51 PM 920 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading - 06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM 839 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading - 06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM 976 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it - 06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM 1102 Views
well so far you have failed to make the argument - 07/06/2011 04:22:00 AM 1030 Views
Depends on the subject matter. - 07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM 852 Views
Basically? Yes. - 07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM 1097 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want? - 07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM 769 Views
Don't be an idiot. - 09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM 955 Views
I am being an idiot? - 09/06/2011 04:10:28 PM 939 Views
I wasn't calling you an idiot for disagreeing with me. - 09/06/2011 04:44:37 PM 999 Views
Do we restrict access or alter parenting? - 06/06/2011 04:31:13 AM 1161 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this - 06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM 1051 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me. - 06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM 987 Views
A+++ would read this reply again *NM* - 06/06/2011 10:23:11 PM 316 Views
+1 *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:12:16 AM 307 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this - 07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM 855 Views
I think he's talking about the review of the tv show they did. - 07/06/2011 03:30:19 AM 792 Views
Indeed. Everything she said. *NM* - 07/06/2011 06:13:20 PM 285 Views
it does take a lot of work to keep track of your kids - 07/06/2011 05:02:55 AM 1009 Views
*I agree with this* *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:18:58 PM 376 Views

Reply to Message