The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
We you talk about all these terrible things can't you see why most parents want to shield their children from these things if possible? For the bad things you describe there are still a lot positives in the world, probably more than ever. You will get happier and better adjusted kids if you can teach them to focus on those positives and not wallow in misery over things they can't change and probably don't even really understand anyways.
You can't shield your kids from things forever. When they're 5, sure, but if they're 14, inquisitive and intelligent enough to want to read the things that interest them, do you really think you're doing them any favors by saying "No, you can't read the Diary of Anne Frank until you're at least 16."
Focusing on the positives is an excellent thing. Telling a teenager that they're not allowed to read a book in which a character gets raped because they're not old enough to handle it will have the exact opposite effect- the very fact that it's forbidden will make it more attractive.
Finally, what exactly do you think is going to happen? They're going to read a novelization of the Saw franchise* and just give up on life?
There's a difference between protecting your kid from attacks, and keeping them cloistered. I'm not saying force-feed them violent imagery. I'm just saying if they're old enough to read through hundreds of pages of a book that has adult or "dark" themes, then the very fact that they have the interest and dedication to read it means that they're too young to have it snapped away and being handed a Boxcar Children mystery.
*God, I hope that doesn't actually exist.
I amuse myself.
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark".
- 05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM
2156 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me
- 05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM
1127 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response.
- 05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
1140 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine
- 05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM
909 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented
- 05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM
982 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture,
- 06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM
1068 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
- 06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM
844 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
- 06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM
798 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason.
- 06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM
1011 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think.
- 07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM
1034 Views
One certainly has to choose the real literature to present, certainly.
- 07/06/2011 02:27:00 PM
1074 Views
Very good post.
- 06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM
885 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so.
*NM*
- 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
317 Views
*NM*
- 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
317 Views
I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as
- 07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM
1133 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly
- 07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM
793 Views
Heh.
- 08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM
1112 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad?
- 08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM
1024 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
- 09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
987 Views
the classic problem of people who have no idea what they are talking about
- 09/06/2011 04:16:25 PM
902 Views
Are you really equating reading about trauma with trauma? They are not the same. *NM*
- 09/06/2011 07:10:34 PM
332 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound,
- 05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM
1167 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies
- 05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM
1123 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here.
- 06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM
1100 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of
- 06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM
1140 Views
I don't completely agree with that.
- 06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
1085 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything
- 06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM
1061 Views
To think the content described is acceptable, when they ban "Huck Finn" for using 'nigger'.
*NM*
- 05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
341 Views
*NM*
- 05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
341 Views
CNN: "On a website, a person named 'Macharius' used the 'N-word'".
- 06/06/2011 01:58:35 AM
843 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
- 06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM
865 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
- 06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM
1021 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
- 06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
1132 Views
Depends on the subject matter.
- 07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM
888 Views
Basically? Yes.
- 07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM
1131 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want?
- 07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM
800 Views
Don't be an idiot.
- 09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM
984 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this
- 06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM
1088 Views
Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
- 06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
954 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me.
- 06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM
1020 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this
- 07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM
886 Views
Having now read one of the books mentioned, Cheryl Rainfield's Scars...
- 08/06/2011 02:18:23 AM
1132 Views
