Active Users:170 Time:19/05/2024 02:36:01 AM
Except that Arkham Horror is pretty much un-win-able imlad Send a noteboard - 18/06/2011 09:43:14 AM
You are more likely to win playing Snakes and Foxes than win playing a game of AH.

I feel like it wouldn't be, since the super-boardgame demographic doesn't match up with the HP audience directly, but still.


Seriously, have you guys seen the ones I'm talking about? Boardgames that cost like 50 bucks, and weigh like 20 pounds? Sooo cool.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
So, wtf is Pottermore? (J. K. Rowling's new project) - 16/06/2011 06:58:49 PM 1307 Views
I want a mini series Based on the original Order of the Phoenix *NM* - 16/06/2011 07:10:24 PM 312 Views
It's a series of potted plants. *NM* - 16/06/2011 07:24:23 PM 290 Views
One week patience and you'll know more? - 16/06/2011 07:51:16 PM 868 Views
There was talk of a Potter encyclopedia - 16/06/2011 08:26:06 PM 722 Views
Pottermore sounds like a country estate - 16/06/2011 10:36:07 PM 798 Views
More money from HP for JKR, obviously. *NM* - 17/06/2011 05:36:06 AM 338 Views
And this bothers you why? *NM* - 17/06/2011 06:07:00 AM 305 Views
Bothers? No idea where you got that idea. *NM* - 22/06/2011 02:30:34 AM 344 Views
The title font makes it look like a game. That said, there are publishing rights listed. *NM* - 17/06/2011 07:44:41 AM 349 Views
If it was a massive, complex board game like Arkam Horror or the like, that could be AWESOME - 17/06/2011 09:37:34 PM 768 Views
Except that Arkham Horror is pretty much un-win-able - 18/06/2011 09:43:14 AM 765 Views
That's definitely not true - 18/06/2011 01:23:28 PM 782 Views

Reply to Message