Active Users:419 Time:03/05/2025 07:27:41 AM
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! RomaVenkat Send a noteboard - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM
I am flabbergasted.

Seriously, they are all, except for the two angels, who have potential, pretty straightforward. Good Omens is brilliant writing that is dedicated to plot, theme, and fun. But it is rather light reading if you want, like, subtlety or some such other thing.


I'll take Aziraphale over Emma Bovary any day.


But some people prefer ninnies so long as they can understand them in their boring entirety.
Roh
Reply to message
Which Pratchett book should I try first? - 08/09/2011 01:56:11 AM 923 Views
Hm. I don't know if I'd call Pratchett "cerebral." He's more... British. - 08/09/2011 03:26:53 AM 719 Views
Re: I'd recommend Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 04:28:18 AM 872 Views
I agree with Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 01:59:56 PM 719 Views
I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 02:28:37 PM 735 Views
Re: Hogfather was my first Death-Sto Helit book. It is so awesome. *NM* - 08/09/2011 03:36:08 PM 315 Views
Re: I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 03:43:33 PM 786 Views
Yeah, that's probably best *NM* - 08/09/2011 05:26:57 PM 294 Views
Yeah, that's a really good idea. - 08/09/2011 06:42:22 PM 769 Views
I've read them in order of publish and I dig that way. - 08/09/2011 04:37:24 PM 768 Views
Re: I don't like the later books quite as much.. - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 749 Views
I did too! It's tough to recommend that to others, though - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 680 Views
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend people start with Color of Magic - 08/09/2011 06:43:20 PM 767 Views
How could you be not impressed by Good Omens? - 08/09/2011 06:35:37 PM 661 Views
Re: Not much depth of character. - 09/09/2011 03:15:55 AM 675 Views
Debt of character, schmept of character - 09/09/2011 05:15:05 AM 753 Views
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM 733 Views
Yes depth. That is how it is spelled - 09/09/2011 05:47:58 AM 750 Views
Hey! - 09/09/2011 11:21:24 PM 679 Views

Reply to Message