Active Users:221 Time:20/05/2024 09:08:25 AM
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! RomaVenkat Send a noteboard - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM
I am flabbergasted.

Seriously, they are all, except for the two angels, who have potential, pretty straightforward. Good Omens is brilliant writing that is dedicated to plot, theme, and fun. But it is rather light reading if you want, like, subtlety or some such other thing.


I'll take Aziraphale over Emma Bovary any day.


But some people prefer ninnies so long as they can understand them in their boring entirety.
Roh
Reply to message
Which Pratchett book should I try first? - 08/09/2011 01:56:11 AM 839 Views
Hm. I don't know if I'd call Pratchett "cerebral." He's more... British. - 08/09/2011 03:26:53 AM 592 Views
Re: I'd recommend Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 04:28:18 AM 734 Views
I agree with Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 01:59:56 PM 602 Views
I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 02:28:37 PM 612 Views
Re: Hogfather was my first Death-Sto Helit book. It is so awesome. *NM* - 08/09/2011 03:36:08 PM 269 Views
Re: I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 03:43:33 PM 661 Views
Yeah, that's probably best *NM* - 08/09/2011 05:26:57 PM 243 Views
Yeah, that's a really good idea. - 08/09/2011 06:42:22 PM 639 Views
I've read them in order of publish and I dig that way. - 08/09/2011 04:37:24 PM 644 Views
Re: I don't like the later books quite as much.. - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 632 Views
I did too! It's tough to recommend that to others, though - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 559 Views
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend people start with Color of Magic - 08/09/2011 06:43:20 PM 645 Views
How could you be not impressed by Good Omens? - 08/09/2011 06:35:37 PM 545 Views
Re: Not much depth of character. - 09/09/2011 03:15:55 AM 551 Views
Debt of character, schmept of character - 09/09/2011 05:15:05 AM 633 Views
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM 613 Views
Yes depth. That is how it is spelled - 09/09/2011 05:47:58 AM 623 Views
Hey! - 09/09/2011 11:21:24 PM 565 Views

Reply to Message