Active Users:821 Time:02/11/2025 02:44:34 AM
Never read it, never plan to. Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM
The only Joyce I've ever read is selections from Dubliners, which while not bad did not exactly compel me to read any more. And by all accounts Ulysses sounds pretentious and unappealing, so no.
Insert theme music here.
Reply to message
Carl Jung's thoughts on Ulysses by James Joyce - 13/09/2011 04:28:21 PM 3432 Views
As far as I can tell, the main reason to read it is so you can say - 13/09/2011 05:38:17 PM 1114 Views
The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 05:57:27 PM 1216 Views
Re: The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 08:22:36 PM 1025 Views
I don't think you can compare fantasy series and real literature - 13/09/2011 09:13:26 PM 1061 Views
...how are you even on this site? - 22/09/2011 04:38:43 PM 1074 Views
I re-read it for the third time this spring - 14/09/2011 12:01:02 AM 1340 Views
Given that you read fast, that's not as damning as it could be - 14/09/2011 02:29:55 AM 1056 Views
I tried the beginning of it once - 14/09/2011 02:31:16 AM 1066 Views
Took a class on it. - 14/09/2011 11:27:24 PM 1097 Views
I could see a short class on it being interesting. - 15/09/2011 04:29:55 AM 1044 Views
Never read it, never plan to. - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM 1102 Views
Pretentious, unappealing and difficult to read. - 15/09/2011 04:25:05 AM 1051 Views
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me. - 15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM 1129 Views
I particularly enjoyed that analogy - 15/09/2011 04:23:16 AM 1051 Views
Actually this is one of the few things I've disagreed with Jung on. - 21/09/2011 12:23:34 AM 978 Views

Reply to Message