Active Users:658 Time:21/06/2026 02:37:05 PM
Never read it, never plan to. Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM
The only Joyce I've ever read is selections from Dubliners, which while not bad did not exactly compel me to read any more. And by all accounts Ulysses sounds pretentious and unappealing, so no.
Insert theme music here.
Reply to message
Carl Jung's thoughts on Ulysses by James Joyce - 13/09/2011 04:28:21 PM 3574 Views
As far as I can tell, the main reason to read it is so you can say - 13/09/2011 05:38:17 PM 1229 Views
The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 05:57:27 PM 1332 Views
Re: The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 08:22:36 PM 1147 Views
I don't think you can compare fantasy series and real literature - 13/09/2011 09:13:26 PM 1179 Views
...how are you even on this site? - 22/09/2011 04:38:43 PM 1211 Views
I re-read it for the third time this spring - 14/09/2011 12:01:02 AM 1463 Views
Given that you read fast, that's not as damning as it could be - 14/09/2011 02:29:55 AM 1194 Views
I tried the beginning of it once - 14/09/2011 02:31:16 AM 1199 Views
Took a class on it. - 14/09/2011 11:27:24 PM 1228 Views
I could see a short class on it being interesting. - 15/09/2011 04:29:55 AM 1169 Views
Never read it, never plan to. - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM 1242 Views
Pretentious, unappealing and difficult to read. - 15/09/2011 04:25:05 AM 1189 Views
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me. - 15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM 1257 Views
I particularly enjoyed that analogy - 15/09/2011 04:23:16 AM 1181 Views
Actually this is one of the few things I've disagreed with Jung on. - 21/09/2011 12:23:34 AM 1121 Views

Reply to Message