Active Users:410 Time:13/09/2025 11:53:21 AM
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me. Vodalus Send a noteboard - 15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM
It is evident that he does not see Joyce as an innovator because he finds him mired in a Mediaeval Catholic Irish world. His studied attempts at distancing himself from this background are like, in Jung’s words, the aristocratic Bolshevik who revels in not shaving. Silly and symbolic gestures are taken to remove the author from his background, but it only reinforces that he is still a slave to a particular mindset.


I said this, or something very much like it, in one of the surveys you made when posting as Сталин. Actually, it was more like "expatriate Irish Catholic apostate", but whatever.
南無阿弥陀仏!
Reply to message
Carl Jung's thoughts on Ulysses by James Joyce - 13/09/2011 04:28:21 PM 3371 Views
As far as I can tell, the main reason to read it is so you can say - 13/09/2011 05:38:17 PM 1075 Views
The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 05:57:27 PM 1178 Views
Re: The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 08:22:36 PM 984 Views
I don't think you can compare fantasy series and real literature - 13/09/2011 09:13:26 PM 1031 Views
...how are you even on this site? - 22/09/2011 04:38:43 PM 1038 Views
I re-read it for the third time this spring - 14/09/2011 12:01:02 AM 1285 Views
Given that you read fast, that's not as damning as it could be - 14/09/2011 02:29:55 AM 1015 Views
I tried the beginning of it once - 14/09/2011 02:31:16 AM 1014 Views
Took a class on it. - 14/09/2011 11:27:24 PM 1056 Views
I could see a short class on it being interesting. - 15/09/2011 04:29:55 AM 1012 Views
Never read it, never plan to. - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM 1057 Views
Pretentious, unappealing and difficult to read. - 15/09/2011 04:25:05 AM 1013 Views
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me. - 15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM 1098 Views
I particularly enjoyed that analogy - 15/09/2011 04:23:16 AM 1014 Views
Actually this is one of the few things I've disagreed with Jung on. - 21/09/2011 12:23:34 AM 947 Views

Reply to Message